mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Automated Assessment of Encouragement and Warmth in Classrooms Leveraging Multimodal Emotional Features and ChatGPT

arXiv 2404.15310 ↗First posted 1 Apr 2024cs.HC cs.AI cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classroom observation protocols standardize the assessment of teaching effectiveness and facilitate comprehension of classroom interactions. Whereas these protocols offer teachers specific feedback on their teaching practices, the manual coding by human raters is resource-intensive and often unreliable. This has sparked interest in developing AI-driven, cost-effective methods for automating such holistic coding. Our work explores a multimodal approach to automatically estimating encouragement and warmth in classrooms, a key component of the Global Teaching Insights (GTI) study's observation protocol. To this end, we employed facial and speech emotion recognition with sentiment analysis to extract interpretable features from video, audio, and transcript data. The prediction task involved both classification and regression methods. Additionally, in light of recent large language models' remarkable text annotation capabilities, we evaluated ChatGPT's zero-shot performance on this scoring task based on transcripts. We demonstrated our approach on the GTI dataset, comprising 367 16-minute video segments from 92 authentic lesson recordings. The inferences of GPT-4 and the best-trained model yielded correlations of r = .341 and r = .441 with human ratings, respectively. Combining estimates from both models through averaging, an ensemble approach achieved a correlation of r = .513, comparable to human inter-rater reliability. Our model explanation analysis indicated that text sentiment features were the primary contributors to the trained model's decisions. Moreover, GPT-4 could deliver logical and concrete reasoning as potential teacher guidelines. Our findings provide insights into using advanced, multimodal techniques for automated classroom observation, aiming to foster teacher training through frequent and valuable feedback.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Apr 2024.

Builds on

12 of 32 references.

References · 12

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  4. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  5. 2020Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning for Speech Recognitioncited by 496
  6. 2017AffectNet: A Database for Facial Expression, Valence, and Arousal Computing in the Wildcited by 490
  7. 2021Emotion Recognition from Speech Using Wav2vec 2.0 Embeddingscited by 158
  8. 2023Is ChatGPT a Good Teacher Coach? Measuring Zero-Shot Performance For Scoring and Providing Actionable Insights on Classroom Instructioncited by 37
  9. 2021Multimodal Engagement Analysis from Facial Videos in the Classroomcited by 27
  10. 2022Evaluating the Explainers: Black-Box Explainable Machine Learning for Student Success Prediction in MOOCscited by 17
  11. 2020Toward Automated Classroom Observation: Multimodal Machine Learning to Estimate CLASS Positive Climate and Negative Climatecited by 8
  12. 2023Automated Evaluation of Classroom Instructional Support with LLMs and BoWs: Connecting Global Predictions to Specific Feedbackcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.