mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Extending the Neural Additive Model for Survival Analysis with EHR Data

arXiv 2211.07814 ↗First posted 15 Nov 2022cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With increasing interest in applying machine learning to develop healthcare solutions, there is a desire to create interpretable deep learning models for survival analysis. In this paper, we extend the Neural Additive Model (NAM) by incorporating pairwise feature interaction networks and equip these models with loss functions that fit both proportional and non-proportional extensions of the Cox model. We show that within this extended framework, we can construct non-proportional hazard models, which we call TimeNAM, that significantly improve performance over the standard NAM model architecture on benchmark survival datasets. We apply these model architectures to data from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) database of Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center (SNUHGC) to build an interpretable neural network survival model for gastric cancer prediction. We demonstrate that on both benchmark survival analysis datasets, as well as on our gastric cancer dataset, our model architectures yield performance that matches, or surpasses, the current state-of-the-art black-box methods.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Nov 2022.

Builds on

9 of 30 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2016DeepSurv: Personalized Treatment Recommender System Using A Cox Proportional Hazards Deep Neural Networkcited by 358
  4. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
  5. 2020Problems with Shapley-value-based explanations as feature importance measurescited by 200
  6. 2019Time-to-Event Prediction with Neural Networks and Cox Regressioncited by 175
  7. 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
  8. 2016On the Safety of Machine Learning: Cyber-Physical Systems, Decision Sciences, and Data Productscited by 52
  9. 2021SurvNAM: The machine learning survival model explanationcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

6 papers.