Exploring Boundaries and Intensities in Offensive and Hate Speech: Unveiling the Complex Spectrum of Social Media Discourse
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The prevalence of digital media and evolving sociopolitical dynamics have significantly amplified the dissemination of hateful content. Existing studies mainly focus on classifying texts into binary categories, often overlooking the continuous spectrum of offensiveness and hatefulness inherent in the text. In this research, we present an extensive benchmark dataset for Amharic, comprising 8,258 tweets annotated for three distinct tasks: category classification, identification of hate targets, and rating offensiveness and hatefulness intensities. Our study highlights that a considerable majority of tweets belong to the less offensive and less hate intensity levels, underscoring the need for early interventions by stakeholders. The prevalence of ethnic and political hatred targets, with significant overlaps in our dataset, emphasizes the complex relationships within Ethiopia's sociopolitical landscape. We build classification and regression models and investigate the efficacy of models in handling these tasks. Our results reveal that hate and offensive speech can not be addressed by a simplistic binary classification, instead manifesting as variables across a continuous range of values. The Afro-XLMR-large model exhibits the best performances achieving F1-scores of 75.30%, 70.59%, and 29.42% for the category, target, and regression tasks, respectively. The 80.22% correlation coefficient of the Afro-XLMR-large model indicates strong alignments.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 52 references.
References · 14
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
- 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 208
- 2022Adapting Pre-trained Language Models to African Languages via Multilingual Adaptive Fine-Tuningcited by 149
- 2019Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysiscited by 133
- 2020Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc Explanationcited by 84
- 2019Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danishcited by 48
- 2022AfroLM: A Self-Active Learning-based Multilingual Pretrained Language Model for 23 African Languagescited by 46
- 2020Confronting Abusive Language Online: A Survey from the Ethical and Human Rights Perspectivecited by 43
- 2020Introducing various Semantic Models for Amharic: Experimentation and Evaluation with multiple Tasks and Datasetscited by 12
- 2020A Legal Approach to Hate Speech: Operationalizing the EU's Legal Framework against the Expression of Hatred as an NLP Taskcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025AfriHate: A Multilingual Collection of Hate Speech and Abusive Language Datasets for African Languagescited by 10
- 2025HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigationcited by 1
- 2024Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Managementcited by 0
- 2026Hate Speech Detection in Turkish and Arabic: A Comprehensive Studycited by 0
- 2026Hate Speech Detection in Turkish and Arabic: A Comprehensive Study30 Jun 2026
- 2025HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation6 Jul 2025
- 2025AfriHate: A Multilingual Collection of Hate Speech and Abusive Language Datasets for African Languages14 Jan 2025
- 2024Demarked: A Strategy for Enhanced Abusive Speech Moderation through Counterspeech, Detoxification, and Message Management27 Jun 2024