MCRanker: Generating Diverse Criteria On-the-Fly to Improve Point-wise LLM Rankers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The most recent pointwise Large Language Model (LLM) rankers have achieved remarkable ranking results. However, these rankers are hindered by two major drawbacks: (1) they fail to follow a standardized comparison guidance during the ranking process, and (2) they struggle with comprehensive considerations when dealing with complicated passages. To address these shortcomings, we propose to build a ranker that generates ranking scores based on a set of criteria from various perspectives. These criteria are intended to direct each perspective in providing a distinct yet synergistic evaluation. Our research, which examines eight datasets from the BEIR benchmark demonstrates that incorporating this multi-perspective criteria ensemble approach markedly enhanced the performance of pointwise LLM rankers.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2024.
Builds on
32 of 40 references.
References · 32
- 2020Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Modelcited by 373
- 2023Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Modelscited by 356
- 2023Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agentscited by 356
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
- 2023Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaborationcited by 246
- 2023Exploring Collaboration Mechanisms for LLM Agents: A Social Psychology Viewcited by 221
- 2023Improving Language Model Negotiation with Self-Play and In-Context Learning from AI Feedbackcited by 202
- 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 200
- 2022Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generationcited by 164
- 2022Repairing the Cracked Foundation: A Survey of Obstacles in Evaluation Practices for Generated Textcited by 154
- 2024Rethinking the Bounds of LLM Reasoning: Are Multi-Agent Discussions the Key?cited by 153
20 more
- 2023RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!cited by 151
- 2024Assisting in Writing Wikipedia-like Articles From Scratch with Large Language Modelscited by 150
- 2023ExpertPrompting: Instructing Large Language Models to be Distinguished Expertscited by 140
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 129
- 2024Is LLM-as-a-Judge Robust? Investigating Universal Adversarial Attacks on Zero-shot LLM Assessmentcited by 117
- 2022RankT5: Fine-Tuning T5 for Text Ranking with Ranking Lossescited by 114
- 2023Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labelscited by 86
- 2023Perspectives on Large Language Models for Relevance Judgmentcited by 84
- 2023Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Modelcited by 81
- 2023RankVicuna: Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with Open-Source Large Language Modelscited by 69
- 2023A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language Modelscited by 53
- 2023Stance Detection with Collaborative Role-Infused LLM-Based Agentscited by 53
- 2023DERA: Enhancing Large Language Model Completions with Dialog-Enabled Resolving Agentscited by 52
- 2020PARADE: Passage Representation Aggregation for Document Rerankingcited by 44
- 2024LongAgent: Scaling Language Models to 128k Context through Multi-Agent Collaborationcited by 38
- 2020Learning-to-Rank with BERT in TF-Rankingcited by 36
- 2023Rank-without-GPT: Building GPT-Independent Listwise Rerankers on Open-Source Large Language Modelscited by 14
- 2020Best Practices for Managing Data Annotation Projectscited by 12
- 2023DORIS-MAE: Scientific Document Retrieval using Multi-level Aspect-based Queriescited by 11
- 2022Learning List-Level Domain-Invariant Representations for Rankingcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learningcited by 58
- 2024TourRank: Utilizing Large Language Models for Documents Ranking with a Tournament-Inspired Strategycited by 47
- 2025A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 37
- 2024JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Rerankingcited by 34
- 2025Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scalescited by 2
- 2026BracketRank: Large Language Model Document Ranking via Reasoning-based Competitive Eliminationcited by 0
- 2026ResRank: Unifying Retrieval and Listwise Reranking via End-to-End Joint Training with Residual Passage Compressioncited by 0
- 2026ResRank: Unifying Retrieval and Listwise Reranking via End-to-End Joint Training with Residual Passage Compression24 Apr 2026
- 2026BracketRank: Large Language Model Document Ranking via Reasoning-based Competitive Elimination10 Apr 2026
- 2025Likert or Not: LLM Absolute Relevance Judgments on Fine-Grained Ordinal Scales25 May 2025
- 2025A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation26 Mar 2025
- 2025Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning8 Mar 2025
- 2024JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking31 Oct 2024
- 2024TourRank: Utilizing Large Language Models for Documents Ranking with a Tournament-Inspired Strategy17 Jun 2024