Tackling Ambiguity from Perspective of Uncertainty Inference and Affinity Diversification for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) with image-level labels intends to achieve dense tasks without laborious annotations. However, due to the ambiguous contexts and fuzzy regions, the performance of WSSS, especially the stages of generating Class Activation Maps (CAMs) and refining pseudo masks, widely suffers from ambiguity while being barely noticed by previous literature. In this work, we propose UniA, a unified single-staged WSSS framework, to efficiently tackle this issue from the perspective of uncertainty inference and affinity diversification, respectively. When activating class objects, we argue that the false activation stems from the bias to the ambiguous regions during the feature extraction. Therefore, we design a more robust feature representation with a probabilistic Gaussian distribution and introduce the uncertainty estimation to avoid the bias. A distribution loss is particularly proposed to supervise the process, which effectively captures the ambiguity and models the complex dependencies among features. When refining pseudo labels, we observe that the affinity from the prevailing refinement methods intends to be similar among ambiguities. To this end, an affinity diversification module is proposed to promote diversity among semantics. A mutual complementing refinement is proposed to initially rectify the ambiguous affinity with multiple inferred pseudo labels. More importantly, a contrastive affinity loss is further designed to diversify the relations among unrelated semantics, which reliably propagates the diversity into the whole feature representations and helps generate better pseudo masks. Extensive experiments are conducted on PASCAL VOC, MS COCO, and medical ACDC datasets, which validate the efficiency of UniA tackling ambiguity and the superiority over recent single-staged or even most multi-staged competitors.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.
Builds on
55 of 74 references.
References · 55
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,859
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
- 2021SegFormer: Simple and Efficient Design for Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 2,940
- 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,436
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2019A Simple Baseline for Bayesian Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 560
- 2014Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets and Fully Connected CRFscited by 554
- 2016ScribbleSup: Scribble-Supervised Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 331
38 more
- 2018Learning Pixel-level Semantic Affinity with Image-level Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 321
- 2020Self-supervised Equivariant Attention Mechanism for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 300
- 2015What's the Point: Semantic Segmentation with Point Supervisioncited by 298
- 2019Weakly Supervised Learning of Instance Segmentation with Inter-pixel Relationscited by 247
- 2015BoxSup: Exploiting Bounding Boxes to Supervise Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 238
- 2020Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 229
- 2017Object Region Mining with Adversarial Erasing: A Simple Classification to Semantic Segmentation Approachcited by 201
- 2016Wider or Deeper: Revisiting the ResNet Model for Visual Recognitioncited by 184
- 2020Single-Stage Semantic Segmentation from Image Labelscited by 167
- 2020Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation via Sub-category Explorationcited by 145
- 2020Mining Cross-Image Semantics for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 144
- 2022Multi-class Token Transformer for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 138
- 2021Anti-Adversarially Manipulated Attributions for Weakly and Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 134
- 2021Railroad is not a Train: Saliency as Pseudo-pixel Supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 127
- 2018On Regularized Losses for Weakly-supervised CNN Segmentationcited by 121
- 2022Learning Affinity from Attention: End-to-End Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation with Transformerscited by 118
- 2022CLIP is Also an Efficient Segmenter: A Text-Driven Approach for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 118
- 2021BBAM: Bounding Box Attribution Map for Weakly Supervised Semantic and Instance Segmentationcited by 105
- 2018Learning random-walk label propagation for weakly-supervised semantic segmentationcited by 101
- 2022Self-supervised Image-specific Prototype Exploration for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 87
- 2021Leveraging Auxiliary Tasks with Affinity Learning for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 77
- 2022Class Re-Activation Maps for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 75
- 2022Revisiting Over-smoothing in BERT from the Perspective of Graphcited by 72
- 2022Cross Language Image Matching for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 72
- 2021Context Decoupling Augmentation for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 69
- 2021Reducing Information Bottleneck for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 65
- 2023Token Contrast for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 65
- 2018Constrained-CNN losses for weakly supervised segmentationcited by 62
- 2022Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation using Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 58
- 2022L2G: A Simple Local-to-Global Knowledge Transfer Framework for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 57
- 2021Vision Transformers with Patch Diversificationcited by 45
- 2022Max Pooling with Vision Transformers reconciles class and shape in weakly supervised semantic segmentationcited by 41
- 2022Threshold Matters in WSSS: Manipulating the Activation for the Robust and Accurate Segmentation Model Against Thresholdscited by 37
- 2022Expansion and Shrinkage of Localization for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 37
- 2021Uncertainty Estimation via Response Scaling for Pseudo-mask Noise Mitigation in Weakly-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 29
- 2022Out-of-Candidate Rectification for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 26
- 2023Self Correspondence Distillation for End-to-End Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 26
- 2021Adaptive Affinity Loss and Erroneous Pseudo-Label Refinement for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 22
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2025Exploring CLIP's Dense Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 8
- 2025DH-Mamba: Exploring Dual-domain Hierarchical State Space Models for MRI Reconstructioncited by 3
- 2024Continuous K-space Recovery Network with Image Guidance for Fast MRI Reconstructioncited by 1
- 2026DiCLIP: Diffusion Model Enhances CLIP's Dense Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 0
- 2026DiCLIP: Diffusion Model Enhances CLIP's Dense Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation6 May 2026
- 2025Exploring CLIP's Dense Knowledge for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation26 Mar 2025
- 2025DH-Mamba: Exploring Dual-domain Hierarchical State Space Models for MRI Reconstruction14 Jan 2025
- 2024Continuous K-space Recovery Network with Image Guidance for Fast MRI Reconstruction18 Nov 2024