mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Measuring Cross-lingual Transfer in Bytes

arXiv 2404.08191 ↗First posted 12 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Multilingual pretraining has been a successful solution to the challenges posed by the lack of resources for languages. These models can transfer knowledge to target languages with minimal or no examples. Recent research suggests that monolingual models also have a similar capability, but the mechanisms behind this transfer remain unclear. Some studies have explored factors like language contamination and syntactic similarity. An emerging line of research suggests that the representations learned by language models contain two components: a language-specific and a language-agnostic component. The latter is responsible for transferring a more universal knowledge. However, there is a lack of comprehensive exploration of these properties across diverse target languages. To investigate this hypothesis, we conducted an experiment inspired by the work on the Scaling Laws for Transfer. We measured the amount of data transferred from a source language to a target language and found that models initialized from diverse languages perform similarly to a target language in a cross-lingual setting. This was surprising because the amount of data transferred to 10 diverse target languages, such as Spanish, Korean, and Finnish, was quite similar. We also found evidence that this transfer is not related to language contamination or language proximity, which strengthens the hypothesis that the model also relies on language-agnostic knowledge. Our experiments have opened up new possibilities for measuring how much data represents the language-agnostic representations learned during pretraining.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Apr 2024.

Builds on

19 of 30 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  3. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,578
  4. 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,112
  5. 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 642
  6. 2019On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representationscited by 575
  7. 2021ByT5: Towards a token-free future with pre-trained byte-to-byte modelscited by 504
  8. 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 313
  9. 2021Scaling Laws for Transfercited by 265
  10. 2022Scaling Up Models and Data with textttt5x and textttseqiocited by 187
  11. 2019Emerging Cross-lingual Structure in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 180
  12. 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 143
7 more
  1. 2022Language Contamination Helps Explain the Cross-lingual Capabilities of English Pretrained Modelscited by 90
  2. 2022Pretraining with Artificial Language: Studying Transferable Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 28
  3. 2022Match the Script, Adapt if Multilingual: Analyzing the Effect of Multilingual Pretraining on Cross-lingual Transferabilitycited by 26
  4. 2020Pre-Training a Language Model Without Human Languagecited by 14
  5. 2021On the ability of monolingual models to learn language-agnostic representationscited by 5
  6. 2023Soft Language Clustering for Multilingual Model Pre-trainingcited by 4
  7. 2022MonoByte: A Pool of Monolingual Byte-level Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.