AI-Guided Defect Detection Techniques to Model Single Crystal Diamond Growth
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
From a process development perspective, diamond growth via chemical vapor deposition has made significant strides. However, challenges persist in achieving high quality and large-area material production. These difficulties include controlling conditions to maintain uniform growth rates for the entire growth surface. As growth progresses, various factors or defect states emerge, altering the uniform conditions. These changes affect the growth rate and result in the formation of crystalline defects at the microscale. However, there is a distinct lack of methods to identify these defect states and their geometry using images taken during the growth process. This paper details seminal work on defect segmentation pipeline using in-situ optical images to identify features that indicate defective states that are visible at the macroscale. Using a semantic segmentation approach as applied in our previous work, these defect states and corresponding derivative features are isolated and classified by their pixel masks. Using an annotation focused human-in-the-loop software architecture to produce training datasets, with modules for selective data labeling using active learning, data augmentations, and model-assisted labeling, our approach achieves effective annotation accuracy and drastically reduces the time and cost of labeling by orders of magnitude. On the model development front, we found that deep learning-based algorithms are the most efficient. They can accurately learn complex representations from feature-rich datasets. Our best-performing model, based on the YOLOV3 and DeeplabV3plus architectures, achieved excellent accuracy for specific features of interest. Specifically, it reached 93.35% accuracy for center defects, 92.83% for polycrystalline defects, and 91.98% for edge defects.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2024.
Builds on
14 of 30 references.
References · 14
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
- 2020A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 216
- 2017A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentationcited by 122
- 2017Learning Active Learning from Datacited by 100
- 2019Deep Learning vs. Traditional Computer Visioncited by 94
- 2020A Survey on Instance Segmentation: State of the artcited by 85
Built on by
Not cited yet.