Graph Neural Networks for Electric and Hydraulic Data Fusion to Enhance Short-term Forecasting of Pumped-storage Hydroelectricity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pumped-storage hydropower plants (PSH) actively participate in grid power-frequency control and therefore often operate under dynamic conditions, which results in rapidly varying system states. Predicting these dynamically changing states is essential for comprehending the underlying sensor and machine conditions. This understanding aids in detecting anomalies and faults, ensuring the reliable operation of the connected power grid, and in identifying faulty and miscalibrated sensors. PSH are complex, highly interconnected systems encompassing electrical and hydraulic subsystems, each characterized by their respective underlying networks that can individually be represented as graphs. To take advantage of this relational inductive bias, graph neural networks (GNNs) have been separately applied to state forecasting tasks in the individual subsystems, but without considering their interdependencies. In PSH, however, these subsystems depend on the same control input, making their operations highly interdependent and interconnected. Consequently, hydraulic and electrical sensor data should be fused across PSH subsystems to improve state forecasting accuracy. This approach has not been explored in GNN literature yet because many available PSH graphs are limited to their respective subsystem boundaries, which makes the method unsuitable to be applied directly. In this work, we introduce the application of spectral-temporal graph neural networks, which leverage self-attention mechanisms to concurrently capture and learn meaningful subsystem interdependencies and the dynamic patterns observed in electric and hydraulic sensors. Our method effectively fuses data from the PSH's subsystems by operating on a unified, system-wide graph, learned directly from the data, This approach leads to demonstrably improved state forecasting performance and enhanced generalizability.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2024.
Builds on
13 of 30 references.
References · 13
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
- 2021A Review of Graph Neural Networks and Their Applications in Power Systemscited by 62
- 2020A3T-GCN: Attention Temporal Graph Convolutional Network for Traffic Forecastingcited by 54
- 2021Long-Range Transformers for Dynamic Spatiotemporal Forecastingcited by 46
- 2021Spatio-temporal graph neural networks for multi-site PV power forecastingcited by 22
- 2021Physics-Informed Graphical Neural Network for Parameter & State Estimations in Power Systemscited by 21
- 2021Power to the Relational Inductive Bias: Graph Neural Networks in Electrical Power Gridscited by 18
- 2022State Estimation in Electric Power Systems Leveraging Graph Neural Networkscited by 11
- 2021Predicting Basin Stability of Power Grids using Graph Neural Networkscited by 10
- 2023DyEdgeGAT: Dynamic Edge via Graph Attention for Early Fault Detection in IIoT Systemscited by 10
- 2020Dynamic Graph-Based Anomaly Detection in the Electrical Gridcited by 9
- 2022Spatial-Temporal Recurrent Graph Neural Networks for Fault Diagnostics in Power Distribution Systemscited by 7
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.