mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Retrieving Examples from Memory for Retrieval Augmented Neural Machine Translation: A Systematic Comparison

arXiv 2404.02835 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 7

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Generation and context integration

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Neural Machine Translation (RAMT) architectures retrieve examples from memory to guide the generation process. While most works in this trend explore new ways to exploit the retrieved examples, the upstream retrieval step is mostly unexplored. In this paper, we study the effect of varying retrieval methods for several translation architectures, to better understand the interplay between these two processes. We conduct experiments in two language pairs in a multi-domain setting and consider several downstream architectures based on a standard autoregressive model, an edit-based model, and a large language model with in-context learning. Our experiments show that the choice of the retrieval technique impacts the translation scores, with variance across architectures. We also discuss the effects of increasing the number and diversity of examples, which are mostly positive across the board.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Generation and context integration, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2024.

Builds on

22 of 46 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Towards Example-Based NMT with Multi-Levenshtein Transformers13 Oct
  2. 2022Neural Machine Translation with Contrastive Translation Memories6 Dec

Other references · 20

  1. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  2. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  3. 2017Six Challenges for Neural Machine Translationcited by 334
  4. 2023Prompting Large Language Model for Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 247
  5. 2020Nearest Neighbor Machine Translationcited by 209
  6. 2024Tower: An Open Multilingual Large Language Model for Translation-Related Taskscited by 205
  7. 2022In-context Examples Selection for Machine Translationcited by 172
  8. 2020Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 160
  9. 2022A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generationcited by 157
  10. 2022Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performancecited by 144
  11. 2021Efficient Nearest Neighbor Language Modelscited by 93
  12. 2018Guiding Neural Machine Translation with Retrieved Translation Piecescited by 63
8 more
  1. 2021Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Translation Memorycited by 61
  2. 2023Investigating the Translation Performance of a Large Multilingual Language Model: the Case of BLOOMcited by 58
  3. 2023Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 58
  4. 2022Chunk-based Nearest Neighbor Machine Translationcited by 21
  5. 2023Augmenting Large Language Model Translators via Translation Memoriescited by 21
  6. 2023CTQScorer: Combining Multiple Features for In-context Example Selection for Machine Translationcited by 12
  7. 2022Nearest Neighbor Non-autoregressive Text Generationcited by 7
  8. 2022Integrating Translation Memories into Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 6.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Optimizing example selection for retrieval-augmented machine translation with translation memories
  2. 2022Improving Robustness of Retrieval Augmented Translation via Shuffling of Suggestions
  3. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Machine Translation with Unstructured Knowledge
  4. 2022Improving Retrieval Augmented Neural Machine Translation by Controlling Source and Fuzzy-Match Interactions
  5. 2023On the Generalization Ability of Retrieval-Enhanced Transformers
  6. 2026To Memorize or to Retrieve: Scaling the Interaction Between Pretraining and Retrieval
  7. 2025Do Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Adapt to Varying User Needs?
  8. 2024A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models