mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Integrating Translation Memories into Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation

arXiv 2210.06020 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2022cs.CLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Non-autoregressive machine translation (NAT) has recently made great progress. However, most works to date have focused on standard translation tasks, even though some edit-based NAT models, such as the Levenshtein Transformer (LevT), seem well suited to translate with a Translation Memory (TM). This is the scenario considered here. We first analyze the vanilla LevT model and explain why it does not do well in this setting. We then propose a new variant, TM-LevT, and show how to effectively train this model. By modifying the data presentation and introducing an extra deletion operation, we obtain performance that are on par with an autoregressive approach, while reducing the decoding load. We also show that incorporating TMs during training dispenses to use knowledge distillation, a well-known trick used to mitigate the multimodality issue.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2022.

Builds on

27 of 42 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  4. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,486
  5. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
  6. 2016Sequence-Level Knowledge Distillationcited by 761
  7. 2017Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 457
  8. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
  9. 2020Nearest Neighbor Machine Translationcited by 209
  10. 2019Levenshtein Transformercited by 197
  11. 2019Understanding Knowledge Distillation in Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 121
  12. 2020Deep Encoder, Shallow Decoder: Reevaluating Non-autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 104
15 more
  1. 2020Fully Non-autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: Tricks of the Tradecited by 99
  2. 2020Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation with Latent Alignmentscited by 96
  3. 2018End-to-End Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation with Connectionist Temporal Classificationcited by 72
  4. 2022A Survey on Non-Autoregressive Generation for Neural Machine Translation and Beyondcited by 64
  5. 2018Guiding Neural Machine Translation with Retrieved Translation Piecescited by 63
  6. 2021Neural Machine Translation with Monolingual Translation Memorycited by 61
  7. 2021Adaptive Nearest Neighbor Machine Translationcited by 58
  8. 2020Lexically Constrained Neural Machine Translation with Levenshtein Transformercited by 45
  9. 2020EDITOR: an Edit-Based Transformer with Repositioning for Neural Machine Translation with Soft Lexical Constraintscited by 24
  10. 2018MS-UEdin Submission to the WMT2018 APE Shared Task: Dual-Source Transformer for Automatic Post-Editingcited by 13
  11. 2021How Does Distilled Data Complexity Impact the Quality and Confidence of Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation?cited by 12
  12. 2022Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation: It's Not as Fast as it Seemscited by 11
  13. 2022Nearest Neighbor Non-autoregressive Text Generationcited by 7
  14. 2022Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Claritycited by 5
  15. 2022Neighbors Are Not Strangers: Improving Non-Autoregressive Translation under Low-Frequency Lexical Constraintscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

5 papers.