mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FPT: Feature Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Readability Assessment

arXiv 2404.02772 ↗First posted 3 Apr 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt-based methods have achieved promising results in most few-shot text classification tasks. However, for readability assessment tasks, traditional prompt methods lackcrucial linguistic knowledge, which has already been proven to be essential. Moreover, previous studies on utilizing linguistic features have shown non-robust performance in few-shot settings and may even impair model performance.To address these issues, we propose a novel prompt-based tuning framework that incorporates rich linguistic knowledge, called Feature Prompt Tuning (FPT). Specifically, we extract linguistic features from the text and embed them into trainable soft prompts. Further, we devise a new loss function to calibrate the similarity ranking order between categories. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method FTP not only exhibits a significant performance improvement over the prior best prompt-based tuning approaches, but also surpasses the previous leading methods that incorporate linguistic features. Also, our proposed model significantly outperforms the large language model gpt-3.5-turbo-16k in most cases. Our proposed method establishes a new architecture for prompt tuning that sheds light on how linguistic features can be easily adapted to linguistic-related tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2024.

Builds on

26 of 41 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  5. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  6. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  7. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  8. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  9. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
  10. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  11. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  12. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 220
14 more
  1. 2021Template-free Prompt Tuning for Few-shot NERcited by 73
  2. 2019Text Readability Assessment for Second Language Learnerscited by 54
  3. 2022Prototypical Verbalizer for Prompt-based Few-shot Tuningcited by 53
  4. 2019Supervised and Unsupervised Neural Approaches to Text Readabilitycited by 45
  5. 2021Pushing on Text Readability Assessment: A Transformer Meets Handcrafted Linguistic Featurescited by 36
  6. 2020Linguistic Features for Readability Assessmentcited by 35
  7. 2021Trends, Limitations and Open Challenges in Automatic Readability Assessment Researchcited by 28
  8. 2021The Power of Prompt Tuning for Low-Resource Semantic Parsingcited by 21
  9. 2021ReadNet: A Hierarchical Transformer Framework for Web Article Readability Analysiscited by 16
  10. 2022A Neural Pairwise Ranking Model for Readability Assessmentcited by 14
  11. 2022Relation Extraction as Open-book Examination: Retrieval-enhanced Prompt Tuningcited by 13
  12. 2023Prompt-based Learning for Text Readability Assessmentcited by 8
  13. 2022A Unified Neural Network Model for Readability Assessment with Feature Projection and Length-Balanced Losscited by 7
  14. 2021Learning Syntactic Dense Embedding with Correlation Graph for Automatic Readability Assessmentcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.