On Linearizing Structured Data in Encoder-Decoder Language Models: Insights from Text-to-SQL
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Structured data, prevalent in tables, databases, and knowledge graphs, poses a significant challenge in its representation. With the advent of large language models (LLMs), there has been a shift towards linearization-based methods, which process structured data as sequential token streams, diverging from approaches that explicitly model structure, often as a graph. Crucially, there remains a gap in our understanding of how these linearization-based methods handle structured data, which is inherently non-linear. This work investigates the linear handling of structured data in encoder-decoder language models, specifically T5. Our findings reveal the model's ability to mimic human-designed processes such as schema linking and syntax prediction, indicating a deep, meaningful learning of structure beyond simple token sequencing. We also uncover insights into the model's internal mechanisms, including the ego-centric nature of structure node encodings and the potential for model compression due to modality fusion redundancy. Overall, this work sheds light on the inner workings of linearization-based methods and could potentially provide guidance for future research.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2024.
Builds on
35 of 58 references.
References · 35
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,139
- 2019What Does BERT Look At? An Analysis of BERT's Attentioncited by 1,003
- 2021Probing Classifiers: Promises, Shortcomings, and Advancescited by 876
- 2023Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLscited by 688
- 2019Designing and Interpreting Probes with Control Taskscited by 640
- 2023DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correctioncited by 477
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2019What do you learn from context? Probing for sentence structure in contextualized word representationscited by 438
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
23 more
- 2019RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 424
- 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 411
- 2020TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Datacited by 398
- 2019Is Attention Interpretable?cited by 389
- 2019Linguistic Knowledge and Transferability of Contextual Representationscited by 383
- 2018AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platformcited by 347
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing with Minimum Description Lengthcited by 232
- 2022UnifiedSKG: Unifying and Multi-Tasking Structured Knowledge Grounding with Text-to-Text Language Modelscited by 231
- 2016Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Taskscited by 216
- 2019Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representationcited by 210
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
- 2020GraPPa: Grammar-Augmented Pre-Training for Table Semantic Parsingcited by 171
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
- 2020Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 133
- 2021Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Modelscited by 131
- 2021LGESQL: Line Graph Enhanced Text-to-SQL Model with Mixed Local and Non-Local Relationscited by 119
- 2022TableFormer: Robust Transformer Modeling for Table-Text Encodingcited by 91
- 2019Representing Schema Structure with Graph Neural Networks for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 74
- 2021Natural SQL: Making SQL Easier to Infer from Natural Language Specificationscited by 68
- 2023Interleaving Pre-Trained Language Models and Large Language Models for Zero-Shot NL2SQL Generationcited by 24
- 2020An information theoretic view on selecting linguistic probescited by 19
- 2022Towards Large-Scale Interpretable Knowledge Graph Reasoning for Dialogue Systemscited by 10
- 2016Discovering Sound Concepts and Acoustic Relations In Textcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.