Enhancing Effectiveness and Robustness in a Low-Resource Regime via Decision-Boundary-aware Data Augmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Efforts to leverage deep learning models in low-resource regimes have led to numerous augmentation studies. However, the direct application of methods such as mixup and cutout to text data, is limited due to their discrete characteristics. While methods using pretrained language models have exhibited efficiency, they require additional considerations for robustness. Inspired by recent studies on decision boundaries, this paper proposes a decision-boundary-aware data augmentation strategy to enhance robustness using pretrained language models. The proposed technique first focuses on shifting the latent features closer to the decision boundary, followed by reconstruction to generate an ambiguous version with a soft label. Additionally, mid-K sampling is suggested to enhance the diversity of the generated sentences. This paper demonstrates the performance of the proposed augmentation strategy compared to other methods through extensive experiments. Furthermore, the ablation study reveals the effect of soft labels and mid-K sampling and the extensibility of the method with curriculum data augmentation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Mar 2024.
Builds on
48 of 68 references.
References · 48
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
- 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
36 more
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 663
- 2019Learning the Difference that Makes a Difference with Counterfactually-Augmented Datacited by 428
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
- 2017Beam Search Strategies for Neural Machine Translationcited by 232
- 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
- 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
- 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 185
- 2019Not Enough Data? Deep Learning to the Rescue!cited by 174
- 2018MMA Training: Direct Input Space Margin Maximization through Adversarial Trainingcited by 171
- 2021Active Learning by Acquiring Contrastive Examplescited by 154
- 2015Adding Gradient Noise Improves Learning for Very Deep Networkscited by 144
- 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
- 2018Conditional BERT Contextual Augmentationcited by 107
- 2020Learning What Makes a Difference from Counterfactual Examples and Gradient Supervisioncited by 66
- 2020CAT: Customized Adversarial Training for Improved Robustnesscited by 61
- 2019Training on Synthetic Noise Improves Robustness to Natural Noise in Machine Translationcited by 52
- 2021How Should Pre-Trained Language Models Be Fine-Tuned Towards Adversarial Robustness?cited by 49
- 2019Lost in Translation: Loss and Decay of Linguistic Richness in Machine Translationcited by 45
- 2020Better Robustness by More Coverage: Adversarial Training with Mixup Augmentation for Robust Fine-tuningcited by 39
- 2021SSMix: Saliency-Based Span Mixup for Text Classificationcited by 39
- 2021Few-Shot Text Classification with Triplet Networks, Data Augmentation, and Curriculum Learningcited by 35
- 2022Robust Models are less Over-Confidentcited by 25
- 2021CrossAug: A Contrastive Data Augmentation Method for Debiasing Fact Verification Modelscited by 23
- 2022ALLSH: Active Learning Guided by Local Sensitivity and Hardnesscited by 23
- 2023Delving into the Adversarial Robustness of Federated Learningcited by 19
- 2022PCC: Paraphrasing with Bottom-k Sampling and Cyclic Learning for Curriculum Data Augmentationcited by 14
- 2022DoubleMix: Simple Interpolation-Based Data Augmentation for Text Classificationcited by 10
- 2021Consistency Training with Virtual Adversarial Discrete Perturbationcited by 9
- 2023Controllable Data Augmentation for Few-Shot Text Mining with Chain-of-Thought Attribute Manipulationcited by 9
- 2022Measuring the Impact of (Psycho-)Linguistic and Readability Features and Their Spill Over Effects on the Prediction of Eye Movement Patternscited by 8
- 2021Influence-guided Data Augmentation for Neural Tensor Completioncited by 7
- 2021LINDA: Unsupervised Learning to Interpolate in Natural Language Processingcited by 6
- 2022Improving robustness of language models from a geometry-aware perspectivecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.