mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Influence-guided Data Augmentation for Neural Tensor Completion

arXiv 2108.10248 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2021cs.LG cs.SIcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

How can we predict missing values in multi-dimensional data (or tensors) more accurately? The task of tensor completion is crucial in many applications such as personalized recommendation, image and video restoration, and link prediction in social networks. Many tensor factorization and neural network-based tensor completion algorithms have been developed to predict missing entries in partially observed tensors. However, they can produce inaccurate estimations as real-world tensors are very sparse, and these methods tend to overfit on the small amount of data. Here, we overcome these shortcomings by presenting a data augmentation technique for tensors. In this paper, we propose DAIN, a general data augmentation framework that enhances the prediction accuracy of neural tensor completion methods. Specifically, DAIN first trains a neural model and finds tensor cell importances with influence functions. After that, DAIN aggregates the cell importance to calculate the importance of each entity (i.e., an index of a dimension). Finally, DAIN augments the tensor by weighted sampling of entity importances and a value predictor. Extensive experimental results show that DAIN outperforms all data augmentation baselines in terms of enhancing imputation accuracy of neural tensor completion on four diverse real-world tensors. Ablation studies of DAIN substantiate the effectiveness of each component of DAIN. Furthermore, we show that DAIN scales near linearly to large datasets.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2021.

Builds on

22 of 49 references.

References · 22

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,293
  3. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  4. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  5. 2019TinyBERT: Distilling BERT for Natural Language Understandingcited by 1,153
  6. 2019Unsupervised Data Augmentation for Consistency Trainingcited by 1,057
  7. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  8. 2017Exploring Generalization in Deep Learningcited by 595
  9. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  10. 2015Unsupervised Learning of Video Representations using LSTMscited by 434
  11. 2017The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learningcited by 368
  12. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
10 more
  1. 2019Population Based Augmentation: Efficient Learning of Augmentation Policy Schedulescited by 153
  2. 2019Augmenting Data with Mixup for Sentence Classification: An Empirical Studycited by 125
  3. 2018Data Augmentation by Pairing Samples for Images Classificationcited by 96
  4. 2017Data Noising as Smoothing in Neural Network Language Modelscited by 78
  5. 2016Understanding data augmentation for classification: when to warp?cited by 74
  6. 2018Text Data Augmentation Made Simple By Leveraging NLP Cloud APIscited by 40
  7. 2016Improved Relation Classification by Deep Recurrent Neural Networks with Data Augmentationcited by 26
  8. 2016Tensor Methods and Recommender Systemscited by 24
  9. 2017Scalable Tucker Factorization for Sparse Tensors - Algorithms and Discoveriescited by 14
  10. 2021MTC: Multiresolution Tensor Completion from Partial and Coarse Observationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

7 papers.