Policy Bifurcation in Safe Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Safe reinforcement learning (RL) offers advanced solutions to constrained optimal control problems. Existing studies in safe RL implicitly assume continuity in policy functions, where policies map states to actions in a smooth, uninterrupted manner; however, our research finds that in some scenarios, the feasible policy should be discontinuous or multi-valued, interpolating between discontinuous local optima can inevitably lead to constraint violations. We are the first to identify the generating mechanism of such a phenomenon, and employ topological analysis to rigorously prove the existence of policy bifurcation in safe RL, which corresponds to the contractibility of the reachable tuple. Our theorem reveals that in scenarios where the obstacle-free state space is non-simply connected, a feasible policy is required to be bifurcated, meaning its output action needs to change abruptly in response to the varying state. To train such a bifurcated policy, we propose a safe RL algorithm called multimodal policy optimization (MUPO), which utilizes a Gaussian mixture distribution as the policy output. The bifurcated behavior can be achieved by selecting the Gaussian component with the highest mixing coefficient. Besides, MUPO also integrates spectral normalization and forward KL divergence to enhance the policy's capability of exploring different modes. Experiments with vehicle control tasks show that our algorithm successfully learns the bifurcated policy and ensures satisfying safety, while a continuous policy suffers from inevitable constraint violations.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Mar 2024.
Builds on
18 of 38 references.
References · 18
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2023Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusioncited by 2,730
- 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
- 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
- 2022Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision-Making?cited by 504
- 2021Implicit Behavioral Cloningcited by 442
- 2019Learning agile and dynamic motor skills for legged robotscited by 402
- 2023Contrastive Energy Prediction for Exact Energy-Guided Diffusion Sampling in Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2023Policy Representation via Diffusion Probability Model for Reinforcement Learningcited by 105
- 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning by Imagining the Near Futurecited by 67
- 2024Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion Modelcited by 62
6 more
- 2022Reachability Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 52
- 2021Greedification Operators for Policy Optimization: Investigating Forward and Reverse KL Divergencescited by 40
- 2021Integrated Decision and Control: Towards Interpretable and Computationally Efficient Driving Intelligencecited by 25
- 2021Joint Synthesis of Safety Certificate and Safe Control Policy using Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
- 2022Safe Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with an Uncertainty-Aware Reachability Certificatecited by 16
- 2020Numerically Stable Dynamic Bicycle Model for Discrete-time Controlcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.