mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Boosting Semi-Supervised Temporal Action Localization by Learning from Non-Target Classes

arXiv 2403.11189 ↗First posted 17 Mar 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The crux of semi-supervised temporal action localization (SS-TAL) lies in excavating valuable information from abundant unlabeled videos. However, current approaches predominantly focus on building models that are robust to the error-prone target class (i.e, the predicted class with the highest confidence) while ignoring informative semantics within non-target classes. This paper approaches SS-TAL from a novel perspective by advocating for learning from non-target classes, transcending the conventional focus solely on the target class. The proposed approach involves partitioning the label space of the predicted class distribution into distinct subspaces: target class, positive classes, negative classes, and ambiguous classes, aiming to mine both positive and negative semantics that are absent in the target class, while excluding ambiguous classes. To this end, we first devise innovative strategies to adaptively select high-quality positive and negative classes from the label space, by modeling both the confidence and rank of a class in relation to those of the target class. Then, we introduce novel positive and negative losses designed to guide the learning process, pushing predictions closer to positive classes and away from negative classes. Finally, the positive and negative processes are integrated into a hybrid positive-negative learning framework, facilitating the utilization of non-target classes in both labeled and unlabeled videos. Experimental results on THUMOS14 and ActivityNet v1.3 demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method over prior state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 37 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2024.

Builds on

37 of 61 references.

References · 37

  1. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,259
  2. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
  3. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 899
  4. 2019Pseudo-Labeling and Confirmation Bias in Deep Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 507
  5. 2017Soft-NMS -- Improving Object Detection With One Line of Codecited by 380
  6. 2019BMN: Boundary-Matching Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 327
  7. 2022ActionFormer: Localizing Moments of Actions with Transformerscited by 308
  8. 2018BSN: Boundary Sensitive Network for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 271
  9. 2019G-TAD: Sub-Graph Localization for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 248
  10. 2018Rethinking the Faster R-CNN Architecture for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 194
  11. 2020Temporal Pyramid Network for Action Recognitioncited by 163
  12. 2018Learning to Learn from Noisy Labeled Datacited by 160
25 more
  1. 2021Learning Salient Boundary Feature for Anchor-free Temporal Action Localizationcited by 156
  2. 2019NLNL: Negative Learning for Noisy Labelscited by 151
  3. 2021End-to-end Temporal Action Detection with Transformercited by 150
  4. 2017UntrimmedNets for Weakly Supervised Action Recognition and Detectioncited by 129
  5. 2021Instant-Teaching: An End-to-End Semi-Supervised Object Detection Frameworkcited by 112
  6. 2017Learning with Biased Complementary Labelscited by 93
  7. 2017Learning from Complementary Labelscited by 88
  8. 2020BSN++: Complementary Boundary Regressor with Scale-Balanced Relation Modeling for Temporal Action Proposal Generationcited by 65
  9. 2016CUHK & ETHZ & SIAT Submission to ActivityNet Challenge 2016cited by 53
  10. 2020Multi-shot Temporal Event Localization: a Benchmarkcited by 52
  11. 2022ReAct: Temporal Action Detection with Relational Queriescited by 47
  12. 2022Label Matching Semi-Supervised Object Detectioncited by 44
  13. 2021Self-Supervised Learning for Semi-Supervised Temporal Action Proposalcited by 39
  14. 2018Spatio-Temporal Channel Correlation Networks for Action Classificationcited by 38
  15. 2019TACNet: Transition-Aware Context Network for Spatio-Temporal Action Detectioncited by 36
  16. 2023Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentation via Gentle Teaching Assistantcited by 34
  17. 2021Graph Convolutional Module for Temporal Action Localization in Videoscited by 29
  18. 2022MAR: Masked Autoencoders for Efficient Action Recognitioncited by 29
  19. 2023Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning by Exploiting All Unlabeled Datacited by 26
  20. 2022RCL: Recurrent Continuous Localization for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 25
  21. 2023Self-Feedback DETR for Temporal Action Detectioncited by 22
  22. 2022Fuzzy Positive Learning for Semi-supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 19
  23. 2022Learning to Refactor Action and Co-occurrence Features for Temporal Action Localizationcited by 18
  24. 2019Learning Temporal Action Proposals With Fewer Labelscited by 17
  25. 2022Semi-Supervised Temporal Action Detection with Proposal-Free Maskingcited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.