Eigenvalue Decay Implies Polynomial-Time Learnability for Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of learning function classes computed by neural networks with various activations (e.g. ReLU or Sigmoid), a task believed to be computationally intractable in the worst-case. A major open problem is to understand the minimal assumptions under which these classes admit provably efficient algorithms. In this work we show that a natural distributional assumption corresponding to em eigenvalue decay of the Gram matrix yields polynomial-time algorithms in the non-realizable setting for expressive classes of networks (e.g. feed-forward networks of ReLUs). We make no assumptions on the structure of the network or the labels. Given sufficiently-strong polynomial eigenvalue decay, we obtain em fully-polynomial time algorithms in em all the relevant parameters with respect to square-loss. Milder decay assumptions also lead to improved algorithms. This is the first purely distributional assumption that leads to polynomial-time algorithms for networks of ReLUs, even with one hidden layer. Further, unlike prior distributional assumptions (e.g., the marginal distribution is Gaussian), eigenvalue decay has been observed in practice on common data sets.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
6 papers.
- 2024Near-Interpolators: Rapid Norm Growth and the Trade-Off between Interpolation and Generalizationcited by 8
- 2021On the Stochastic Stability of Deep Markov Modelscited by 4
- 2024Quantum AI for Alzheimer's disease early screeningcited by 2
- 2025Perturbing the Derivative: Doubly Wild Refitting for Model-Free Evaluation of Opaque Machine Learning Predictorscited by 2
- 2025Perturbing the Derivative: Wild Refitting for Model-Free Evaluation of Machine Learning Models under Bregman Lossescited by 0
- 2025NexusFlow: Unifying Disparate Tasks under Partial Supervision via Invertible Flow Networkscited by 0
- 2025NexusFlow: Unifying Disparate Tasks under Partial Supervision via Invertible Flow Networks6 Dec 2025
- 2025Perturbing the Derivative: Doubly Wild Refitting for Model-Free Evaluation of Opaque Machine Learning Predictors24 Nov 2025
- 2025Perturbing the Derivative: Wild Refitting for Model-Free Evaluation of Machine Learning Models under Bregman Losses2 Sep 2025
- 2024Quantum AI for Alzheimer's disease early screening1 May 2024
- 2024Near-Interpolators: Rapid Norm Growth and the Trade-Off between Interpolation and Generalization12 Mar 2024
- 2021On the Stochastic Stability of Deep Markov Models8 Nov 2021