mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Aligning GPTRec with Beyond-Accuracy Goals with Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2403.04875 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2024cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adaptations of Transformer models, such as BERT4Rec and SASRec, achieve state-of-the-art performance in the sequential recommendation task according to accuracy-based metrics, such as NDCG. These models treat items as tokens and then utilise a score-and-rank approach (Top-K strategy), where the model first computes item scores and then ranks them according to this score. While this approach works well for accuracy-based metrics, it is hard to use it for optimising more complex beyond-accuracy metrics such as diversity. Recently, the GPTRec model, which uses a different Next-K strategy, has been proposed as an alternative to the Top-K models. In contrast with traditional Top-K recommendations, Next-K generates recommendations item-by-item and, therefore, can account for complex item-to-item interdependencies important for the beyond-accuracy measures. However, the original GPTRec paper focused only on accuracy in experiments and needed to address how to optimise the model for complex beyond-accuracy metrics. Indeed, training GPTRec for beyond-accuracy goals is challenging because the interaction training data available for training recommender systems typically needs to be aligned with beyond-accuracy recommendation goals. To solve the misalignment problem, we train GPTRec using a 2-stage approach: in the first stage, we use a teacher-student approach to train GPTRec, mimicking the behaviour of traditional Top-K models; in the second stage, we use Reinforcement Learning to align the model for beyond-accuracy goals. In particular, we experiment with increasing recommendation diversity and reducing popularity bias. Our experiments on two datasets show that in 3 out of 4 cases, GPTRec's Next-K generation approach offers a better tradeoff between accuracy and secondary metrics than classic greedy re-ranking techniques.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2024.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  5. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  6. 2018Self-Attentive Sequential Recommendationcited by 1,169
  7. 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 952
  8. 2021Reinforcement learning based recommender systems: A surveycited by 187
  9. 2020Self-Supervised Reinforcement Learning for Recommender Systemscited by 49
  10. 2019Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Adversarial Training for Online Recommendationcited by 33
  11. 2023gSASRec: Reducing Overconfidence in Sequential Recommendation Trained with Negative Samplingcited by 29
  12. 2022A Systematic Review and Replicability Study of BERT4Rec for Sequential Recommendationcited by 22
5 more
  1. 2022Multi-Task Fusion via Reinforcement Learning for Long-Term User Satisfaction in Recommender Systemscited by 22
  2. 2021Choosing the Best of Both Worlds: Diverse and Novel Recommendations through Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 14
  3. 2023Generative Slate Recommendation with Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  4. 2023RecJPQ: Training Large-Catalogue Sequential Recommenderscited by 8
  5. 2018A new system-wide diversity measure for recommendations with efficient algorithmscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.