mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ObjectCompose: Evaluating Resilience of Vision-Based Models on Object-to-Background Compositional Changes

arXiv 2403.04701 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Given the large-scale multi-modal training of recent vision-based models and their generalization capabilities, understanding the extent of their robustness is critical for their real-world deployment. In this work, we evaluate the resilience of current vision-based models against diverse object-to-background context variations. The majority of robustness evaluation methods have introduced synthetic datasets to induce changes to object characteristics (viewpoints, scale, color) or utilized image transformation techniques (adversarial changes, common corruptions) on real images to simulate shifts in distributions. Recent works have explored leveraging large language models and diffusion models to generate changes in the background. However, these methods either lack in offering control over the changes to be made or distort the object semantics, making them unsuitable for the task. Our method, on the other hand, can induce diverse object-to-background changes while preserving the original semantics and appearance of the object. To achieve this goal, we harness the generative capabilities of text-to-image, image-to-text, and image-to-segment models to automatically generate a broad spectrum of object-to-background changes. We induce both natural and adversarial background changes by either modifying the textual prompts or optimizing the latents and textual embedding of text-to-image models. We produce various versions of standard vision datasets (ImageNet, COCO), incorporating either diverse and realistic backgrounds into the images or introducing color, texture, and adversarial changes in the background. We conduct extensive experiments to analyze the robustness of vision-based models against object-to-background context variations across diverse tasks. Code https://github.com/Muhammad-Huzaifaa/ObjectCompose.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2024.

Builds on

59 of 67 references.

References · 59

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  5. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,694
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  8. 2020Denoising Diffusion Implicit Modelscited by 9,655
  9. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  10. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  11. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  12. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
38 more
  1. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,069
  5. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  9. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  10. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
  11. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  12. 2022Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Controlcited by 2,409
  13. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,269
  14. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,842
  15. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  16. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  17. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,401
  18. 2021Palette: Image-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 1,296
  19. 2022Imagic: Text-Based Real Image Editing with Diffusion Modelscited by 1,172
  20. 2022Null-text Inversion for Editing Real Images using Guided Diffusion Modelscited by 1,168
  21. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  22. 2023Vision Transformers Need Registerscited by 844
  23. 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 786
  24. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  25. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 685
  26. 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
  27. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
  28. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  29. 2018Strike (with) a Pose: Neural Networks Are Easily Fooled by Strange Poses of Familiar Objectscited by 143
  30. 2018Constructing Unrestricted Adversarial Examples with Generative Modelscited by 135
  31. 2019On the Transfer of Inductive Bias from Simulation to the Real World: a New Disentanglement Datasetcited by 100
  32. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 98
  33. 2023Diffusion Models for Imperceptible and Transferable Adversarial Attackcited by 93
  34. 2022A Comprehensive Study of Image Classification Model Sensitivity to Foregrounds, Backgrounds, and Visual Attributescited by 56
  35. 2018Not Using the Car to See the Sidewalk: Quantifying and Controlling the Effects of Context in Classification and Segmentationcited by 49
  36. 2022Patch-Fool: Are Vision Transformers Always Robust Against Adversarial Perturbations?cited by 47
  37. 2023LANCE: Stress-testing Visual Models by Generating Language-guided Counterfactual Imagescited by 46
  38. 2022ImageNet-X: Understanding Model Mistakes with Factor of Variation Annotationscited by 44

50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024ImageNet-D: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness on Diffusion Synthetic Object
  2. 2023Benchmarking Robustness of Adaptation Methods on Pre-trained Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignment
  4. 2024Cityscape-Adverse: Benchmarking Robustness of Semantic Segmentation with Realistic Scene Modifications via Diffusion-Based Image Editing
  5. 2025Test-Time Modification: Inverse Domain Transformation for Robust Perception
  6. 2025On the Domain Robustness of Contrastive Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Robustifying Vision-Language Models via Test-Time Prompt Adaptation
  8. 2025Evaluating Compositional Scene Understanding in Multimodal Generative Models