mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enhancing Court View Generation with Knowledge Injection and Guidance

arXiv 2403.04366 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2024cs.AIcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Court View Generation (CVG) is a challenging task in the field of Legal Artificial Intelligence (LegalAI), which aims to generate court views based on the plaintiff claims and the fact descriptions. While Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) have showcased their prowess in natural language generation, their application to the complex, knowledge-intensive domain of CVG often reveals inherent limitations. In this paper, we present a novel approach, named Knowledge Injection and Guidance (KIG), designed to bolster CVG using PLMs. To efficiently incorporate domain knowledge during the training stage, we introduce a knowledge-injected prompt encoder for prompt tuning, thereby reducing computational overhead. Moreover, to further enhance the model's ability to utilize domain knowledge, we employ a generating navigator, which dynamically guides the text generation process in the inference stage without altering the model's architecture, making it readily transferable. Comprehensive experiments on real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach compared to several established baselines, especially in the responsivity of claims, where it outperforms the best baseline by 11.87%.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2024.

Builds on

25 of 41 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
  4. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,124
  6. 2017Get To The Point: Summarization with Pointer-Generator Networkscited by 1,281
  7. 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
  8. 2019DialoGPT: Large-Scale Generative Pre-training for Conversational Response Generationcited by 842
  9. 2019CTRL: A Conditional Transformer Language Model for Controllable Generationcited by 754
  10. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
  11. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
  12. 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
13 more
  1. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
  2. 2019Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in Englishcited by 208
  3. 2021KnowPrompt: Knowledge-aware Prompt-tuning with Synergistic Optimization for Relation Extractioncited by 180
  4. 2020How Does NLP Benefit Legal System: A Summary of Legal Artificial Intelligencecited by 128
  5. 2019JEC-QA: A Legal-Domain Question Answering Datasetcited by 115
  6. 2021Lawformer: A Pre-trained Language Model for Chinese Legal Long Documentscited by 115
  7. 2020Distinguish Confusing Law Articles for Legal Judgment Predictioncited by 62
  8. 2017Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basiscited by 61
  9. 2022Legal Prompting: Teaching a Language Model to Think Like a Lawyercited by 60
  10. 2023Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaborationcited by 52
  11. 2022DisCup: Discriminator Cooperative Unlikelihood Prompt-tuning for Controllable Text Generationcited by 30
  12. 2021Controllable Generation from Pre-trained Language Models via Inverse Promptingcited by 29
  13. 2021Response Generation with Context-Aware Prompt Learningcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

5 papers.