mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Balancing Enhancement, Harmlessness, and General Capabilities: Enhancing Conversational LLMs with Direct RLHF

arXiv 2403.02513 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 15

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Medical LLM alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent advancements in Conversational Large Language Models (LLMs), a concerning trend has emerged, showing that many new base LLMs experience a knowledge reduction in their foundational capabilities following Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT). This process often leads to issues such as forgetting or a decrease in the base model's abilities. Moreover, fine-tuned models struggle to align with user preferences, inadvertently increasing the generation of toxic outputs when specifically prompted. To overcome these challenges, we adopted an innovative approach by completely bypassing SFT and directly implementing Harmless Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Our method not only preserves the base model's general capabilities but also significantly enhances its conversational abilities, while notably reducing the generation of toxic outputs. Our approach holds significant implications for fields that demand a nuanced understanding and generation of responses, such as customer service. We applied this methodology to Mistral, the most popular base model, thereby creating Mistral-Plus. Our validation across 11 general tasks demonstrates that Mistral-Plus outperforms similarly sized open-source base models and their corresponding instruct versions. Importantly, the conversational abilities of Mistral-Plus were significantly improved, indicating a substantial advancement over traditional SFT models in both safety and user preference alignment.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Medical LLM alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 25 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2024.

Builds on

25 of 45 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  5. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  6. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  7. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  8. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  9. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  10. 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
  11. 2020RealToxicityPrompts: Evaluating Neural Toxic Degeneration in Language Modelscited by 1,235
  12. 2021A General Language Assistant as a Laboratory for Alignmentcited by 1,023
13 more
  1. 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferencescited by 906
  2. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  3. 2023AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Modelscited by 701
  4. 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 216
  5. 2024A Mechanistic Understanding of Alignment Algorithms: A Case Study on DPO and Toxicitycited by 179
  6. 2023Mechanistically analyzing the effects of fine-tuning on procedurally defined taskscited by 110
  7. 2024LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rankcited by 94
  8. 2023LLMs and the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus: Successes, Failures, and the Importance of Object-based Representationscited by 81
  9. 2022Whose Language Counts as High Quality? Measuring Language Ideologies in Text Data Selectioncited by 52
  10. 2022Two-stage LLM Fine-tuning with Less Specialization and More Generalizationcited by 39
  11. 2023Balancing Specialized and General Skills in LLMs: The Impact of Modern Tuning and Data Strategycited by 18
  12. 2023GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyondcited by 14
  13. 2024ICE-GRT: Instruction Context Enhancement by Generative Reinforcement based Transformerscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 7; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024A Framework for Fine-Tuning LLMs using Heterogeneous Feedback
  2. 2025RLHF Fine-Tuning of LLMs for Alignment with Implicit User Feedback in Conversational Recommenders
  3. 2024Rewriting Conversational Utterances with Instructed Large Language Models
  4. 2025Offline RL by Reward-Weighted Fine-Tuning for Conversation Optimization
  5. 2025When Actions Teach You to Think: Reasoning-Action Synergy via Reinforcement Learning in Conversational Agents
  6. 2023Chat Vector: A Simple Approach to Equip LLMs with Instruction Following and Model Alignment in New Languages
  7. 2025Equilibrate RLHF: Towards Balancing Helpfulness-Safety Trade-off in Large Language Models
  8. 2024The Ultimate Guide to Fine-Tuning LLMs from Basics to Breakthroughs: An Exhaustive Review of Technologies, Research, Best Practices, Applied Research Challenges and Opportunities