mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Detecting Multi-Sensor Fusion Errors in Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems

arXiv 2109.06404 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2021cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS) have been thriving and widely deployed in recent years. In general, these systems receive sensor data, compute driving decisions, and output control signals to the vehicles. To smooth out the uncertainties brought by sensor outputs, they usually leverage multi-sensor fusion (MSF) to fuse the sensor outputs and produce a more reliable understanding of the surroundings. However, MSF cannot completely eliminate the uncertainties since it lacks the knowledge about which sensor provides the most accurate data and how to optimally integrate the data provided by the sensors. As a result, critical consequences might happen unexpectedly. In this work, we observed that the popular MSF methods in an industry-grade ADAS can mislead the car control and result in serious safety hazards. We define the failures (e.g., car crashes) caused by the faulty MSF as fusion errors and develop a novel evolutionary-based domain-specific search framework, FusED, for the efficient detection of fusion errors. We further apply causality analysis to show that the found fusion errors are indeed caused by the MSF method. We evaluate our framework on two widely used MSF methods in two driving environments. Experimental results show that FusED identifies more than 150 fusion errors. Finally, we provide several suggestions to improve the MSF methods we study.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2021.

Builds on

19 of 64 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  2. 20203D-CVF: Generating Joint Camera and LiDAR Features Using Cross-View Spatial Feature Fusion for 3D Object Detectioncited by 176
  3. 2021Invisible for both Camera and LiDAR: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in Autonomous Driving Under Physical-World Attackscited by 101
  4. 2019Neural Network Attributions: A Causal Perspectivecited by 77
  5. 2018Scalable End-to-End Autonomous Vehicle Testing via Rare-event Simulationcited by 76
  6. 2020Learning to Collide: An Adaptive Safety-Critical Scenarios Generating Methodcited by 74
  7. 2019Adaptive Stress Testing for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 70
  8. 2018The Art, Science, and Engineering of Fuzzing: A Surveycited by 61
  9. 2020Multimodal Safety-Critical Scenarios Generation for Decision-Making Algorithms Evaluationcited by 54
  10. 2015A Modification of the Halpern-Pearl Definition of Causalitycited by 47
  11. 2021Exploring Adversarial Robustness of Multi-Sensor Perception Systems in Self Drivingcited by 45
  12. 2020Adversarial Evaluation of Autonomous Vehicles in Lane-Change Scenarioscited by 42
7 more
  1. 2020Drift with Devil: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Localization in High-Level Autonomous Driving under GPS Spoofing (Extended Version)cited by 25
  2. 2020Training Adversarial Agents to Exploit Weaknesses in Deep Control Policiescited by 24
  3. 2018Causal Learning and Explanation of Deep Neural Networks via Autoencoded Activationscited by 23
  4. 2019Efficient Black-box Assessment of Autonomous Vehicle Safetycited by 23
  5. 2021Neural Network Guided Evolutionary Fuzzing for Finding Traffic Violations of Autonomous Vehiclescited by 19
  6. 2021Coverage-based Scene Fuzzing for Virtual Autonomous Driving Testingcited by 4
  7. 2020Sequential Attacks on Kalman Filter-based Forward Collision Warning Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.

8 papers.