mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

An Empirical Study of Data Ability Boundary in LLMs' Math Reasoning

arXiv 2403.00799 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.LGcited by 7

On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are displaying emergent abilities for math reasoning tasks,and there is a growing attention on enhancing the ability of open-source LLMs through supervised fine-tuning (SFT).In this paper, we aim to explore a general data strategy for supervised data to help optimize and expand math reasoning ability.Firstly, we determine the ability boundary of reasoning paths augmentation by identifying these paths' minimal optimal set.Secondly, we validate that different abilities of the model can be cumulatively enhanced by Mix of Minimal Optimal Sets of corresponding types of data, while our models MMOS achieve SOTA performance on series base models under much lower construction costs.Besides, we point out GSM-HARD is not really hard and today's LLMs no longer lack numerical robustness.Also, we provide an Auto Problem Generator for robustness testing and educational applications.Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/cyzhh/MMOS.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.

Builds on

27 of 34 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023MuggleMath: Assessing the Impact of Query and Response Augmentation on Math Reasoning9 Oct
  2. 2023MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning5 Oct
  3. 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving29 Sep
  4. 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct18 Aug
  5. 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models3 Aug
  6. 2022A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning20 Dec
  7. 2022Learning Math Reasoning from Self-Sampled Correct and Partially-Correct Solutions28 May

Other references · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  4. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  5. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  6. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  7. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  8. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  9. 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
  10. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  11. 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
  12. 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
8 more
  1. 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
  2. 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
  3. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
  4. 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
  5. 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
  6. 2023Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoningcited by 195
  7. 2021Meta-learning via Language Model In-context Tuningcited by 163
  8. 2022Towards Robust Numerical Question Answering: Diagnosing Numerical Capabilities of NLP Systemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time
  2. 2025Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude: Adaptive Reasoning for Mathematical Problem Solving
  3. 2024Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical and Coding Competency through Ontology-guided Interventions
  4. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models for Math Reasoning Tasks
  5. 2024Assessing the Emergent Symbolic Reasoning Abilities of Llama Large Language Models
  6. 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers
  7. 2024Not All LLM Reasoners Are Created Equal
  8. 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges