An Empirical Study of Data Ability Boundary in LLMs' Math Reasoning
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) are displaying emergent abilities for math reasoning tasks,and there is a growing attention on enhancing the ability of open-source LLMs through supervised fine-tuning (SFT).In this paper, we aim to explore a general data strategy for supervised data to help optimize and expand math reasoning ability.Firstly, we determine the ability boundary of reasoning paths augmentation by identifying these paths' minimal optimal set.Secondly, we validate that different abilities of the model can be cumulatively enhanced by Mix of Minimal Optimal Sets of corresponding types of data, while our models MMOS achieve SOTA performance on series base models under much lower construction costs.Besides, we point out GSM-HARD is not really hard and today's LLMs no longer lack numerical robustness.Also, we provide an Auto Problem Generator for robustness testing and educational applications.Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/cyzhh/MMOS.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 7
Same direction, newest first
- 2023MuggleMath: Assessing the Impact of Query and Response Augmentation on Math Reasoning9 Oct
- 2023MathCoder: Seamless Code Integration in LLMs for Enhanced Mathematical Reasoning5 Oct
- 2023ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving29 Sep
- 2023WizardMath: Empowering Mathematical Reasoning for Large Language Models via Reinforced Evol-Instruct18 Aug
- 2023Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models3 Aug
- 2022A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning20 Dec
- 2022Learning Math Reasoning from Self-Sampled Correct and Partially-Correct Solutions28 May
Other references · 20
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
- 2019The Curious Case of Neural Text Degenerationcited by 2,881
- 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
- 2023Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Codecited by 2,105
- 2022Least-to-Most Prompting Enables Complex Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 1,397
8 more
- 2022Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Taskscited by 1,057
- 2022STaR: Bootstrapping Reasoning With Reasoningcited by 895
- 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 724
- 2022PAL: Program-aided Language Modelscited by 635
- 2023MAmmoTH: Building Math Generalist Models through Hybrid Instruction Tuningcited by 483
- 2023Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoningcited by 195
- 2021Meta-learning via Language Model In-context Tuningcited by 163
- 2022Towards Robust Numerical Question Answering: Diagnosing Numerical Capabilities of NLP Systemscited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.
7 papers.
- 2024JiuZhang3.0: Efficiently Improving Mathematical Reasoning by Training Small Data Synthesis Modelscited by 44
- 2025X-Reasoner: Towards Generalizable Reasoning Across Modalities and Domainscited by 30
- 2025To Code or not to Code? Adaptive Tool Integration for Math Language Models via Expectation-Maximizationcited by 25
- 2025Advancing Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models: The Impact of Problem-Solving Data, Data Synthesis Methods, and Training Stagescited by 13
- 2025Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solvingcited by 7
- 2024Curriculum Demonstration Selection for In-Context Learningcited by 5
- 2024Learning Mathematical Rules with Large Language Modelscited by 1
- 2025Evaluation of LLMs for mathematical problem solving30 May 2025
- 2025X-Reasoner: Towards Generalizable Reasoning Across Modalities and Domains6 May 2025
- 2025To Code or not to Code? Adaptive Tool Integration for Math Language Models via Expectation-Maximization2 Feb 2025
- 2025Advancing Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models: The Impact of Problem-Solving Data, Data Synthesis Methods, and Training Stages23 Jan 2025
- 2024Curriculum Demonstration Selection for In-Context Learning27 Nov 2024
- 2024Learning Mathematical Rules with Large Language Models22 Oct 2024
- 2024JiuZhang3.0: Efficiently Improving Mathematical Reasoning by Training Small Data Synthesis Models23 May 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time
- 2025Teaching LLMs According to Their Aptitude: Adaptive Reasoning for Mathematical Problem Solving
- 2024Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical and Coding Competency through Ontology-guided Interventions
- 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models for Math Reasoning Tasks
- 2024Assessing the Emergent Symbolic Reasoning Abilities of Llama Large Language Models
- 2024GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers
- 2024Not All LLM Reasoners Are Created Equal
- 2026Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges