mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RAID: Refusal-Aware and Integrated Decoding for Jailbreaking LLMs

arXiv 2510.13901 ↗First posted 14 Oct 2025cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance across diverse tasks yet remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass safety mechanisms. We present RAID (Refusal-Aware and Integrated Decoding), a framework that systematically probes these weaknesses by crafting adversarial suffixes that induce restricted content while preserving fluency. RAID relaxes discrete tokens into continuous embeddings and optimizes them with a joint objective that (i) encourages restricted responses, (ii) incorporates a refusal-aware regularizer to steer activations away from refusal directions in embedding space, and (iii) applies a coherence term to maintain semantic plausibility and non-redundancy. After optimization, a critic-guided decoding procedure maps embeddings back to tokens by balancing embedding affinity with language-model likelihood. This integration yields suffixes that are both effective in bypassing defenses and natural in form. Experiments on multiple open-source LLMs show that RAID achieves higher attack success rates with fewer queries and lower computational cost than recent white-box and black-box baselines. These findings highlight the importance of embedding-space regularization for understanding and mitigating LLM jailbreak vulnerabilities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 15 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2025.

Builds on

15 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 8

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Playing the Fool: Jailbreaking LLMs and Multimodal LLMs with Out-of-Distribution Strategy26 Mar
  2. 2024DiffusionAttacker: Diffusion-Driven Prompt Manipulation for LLM Jailbreak23 Dec
  3. 2024Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey5 Jul
  4. 2024AdvPrompter: Fast Adaptive Adversarial Prompting for LLMs21 Apr
  5. 2024ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings25 Feb
  6. 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllability13 Feb
  7. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?5 Jul
  8. 2023Jailbreaking ChatGPT via Prompt Engineering: An Empirical Study23 May

Other references · 7

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  2. 2022Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 3,634
  3. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  4. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 960
  5. 2019Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text Generationcited by 793
  6. 2021FUDGE: Controlled Text Generation With Future Discriminatorscited by 374
  7. 2024Safety Layers in Aligned Large Language Models: The Key to LLM Securitycited by 126

Built on by

Not cited yet.