mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

QIS : Interactive Segmentation via Quasi-Conformal Mappings

arXiv 2402.14695 ↗First posted 22 Feb 2024cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Image segmentation plays a crucial role in extracting important objects of interest from images, enabling various applications. While existing methods have shown success in segmenting clean images, they often struggle to produce accurate segmentation results when dealing with degraded images, such as those containing noise or occlusions. To address this challenge, interactive segmentation has emerged as a promising approach, allowing users to provide meaningful input to guide the segmentation process. However, an important problem in interactive segmentation lies in determining how to incorporate minimal yet meaningful user guidance into the segmentation model. In this paper, we propose the quasi-conformal interactive segmentation (QIS) model, which incorporates user input in the form of positive and negative clicks. Users mark a few pixels belonging to the object region as positive clicks, indicating that the segmentation model should include a region around these clicks. Conversely, negative clicks are provided on pixels belonging to the background, instructing the model to exclude the region near these clicks from the segmentation mask. Additionally, the segmentation mask is obtained by deforming a template mask with the same topology as the object of interest using an orientation-preserving quasiconformal mapping. This approach helps to avoid topological errors in the segmentation results. We provide a thorough analysis of the proposed model, including theoretical support for the ability of QIS to include or exclude regions of interest or disinterest based on the user's indication. To evaluate the performance of QIS, we conduct experiments on synthesized images, medical images, natural images and noisy natural images. The results demonstrate the efficacy of our proposed method.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.

Builds on

16 of 58 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,429
  2. 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
  3. 2021Reviving Iterative Training with Mask Guidance for Interactive Segmentationcited by 163
  4. 2016Deep Interactive Object Selectioncited by 160
  5. 2020f-BRS: Rethinking Backpropagating Refinement for Interactive Segmentationcited by 117
  6. 2022FocalClick: Towards Practical Interactive Image Segmentationcited by 102
  7. 2013Landmark and Intensity Based Registration with Large Deformations via Quasi-conformal Mapscited by 17
  8. 2021Topology-Preserving 3D Image Segmentation Based On Hyperelastic Regularizationcited by 13
  9. 2014Fast Disk Conformal Parameterization of Simply-connected Open Surfacescited by 12
  10. 2015Spherical Conformal Parameterization of Genus-0 Point Clouds for Meshingcited by 11
  11. 2022A Learning-based Framework for Topology-Preserving Segmentation using Quasiconformal Mappingscited by 10
  12. 2020Free-boundary conformal parameterization of point cloudscited by 8
4 more
  1. 2021A unifying framework for n-dimensional quasi-conformal mappingscited by 7
  2. 2020A Generalized Asymmetric Dual-front Model for Active Contours and Image Segmentationcited by 4
  3. 2022Topology-Preserving Segmentation Network: A Deep Learning Segmentation Framework for Connected Componentcited by 4
  4. 2015A novel variational model for image registration using Gaussian curvaturecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.