On the Importance of Architecture and Feature Selection in Differentially Private Machine Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a pitfall in the typical workflow for differentially private machine learning. The use of differentially private learning algorithms in a "drop-in" fashion -- without accounting for the impact of differential privacy (DP) noise when choosing what feature engineering operations to use, what features to select, or what neural network architecture to use -- yields overly complex and poorly performing models. In other words, by anticipating the impact of DP noise, a simpler and more accurate alternative model could have been trained for the same privacy guarantee. We systematically study this phenomenon through theory and experiments. On the theory front, we provide an explanatory framework and prove that the phenomenon arises naturally from the addition of noise to satisfy differential privacy. On the experimental front, we demonstrate how the phenomenon manifests in practice using various datasets, types of models, tasks, and neural network architectures. We also analyze the factors that contribute to the problem and distill our experimental insights into concrete takeaways that practitioners can follow when training models with differential privacy. Finally, we propose privacy-aware algorithms for feature selection and neural network architecture search. We analyze their differential privacy properties and evaluate them empirically.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2022.
Builds on
18 of 63 references.
References · 18
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2019Differential Privacy Has Disparate Impact on Model Accuracycited by 316
- 2020Differentially Private Learning Needs Better Features (or Much More Data)cited by 235
- 2019SGD: General Analysis and Improved Ratescited by 207
- 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 142
- 2017Genetic CNNcited by 124
- 2020Tempered Sigmoid Activations for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 122
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
- 2020Bypassing the Ambient Dimension: Private SGD with Gradient Subspace Identificationcited by 90
- 2019Segmentations-Leak: Membership Inference Attacks and Defenses in Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 32
6 more
- 2020Improving Deep Learning with Differential Privacy using Gradient Encoding and Denoisingcited by 30
- 2018Three Tools for Practical Differential Privacycited by 20
- 2021DPNAS: Neural Architecture Search for Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 20
- 2019Automatic Discovery of Privacy-Utility Pareto Frontscited by 16
- 2020Removing Disparate Impact of Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent on Model Accuracycited by 13
- 2021Architecture Matters: Investigating the Influence of Differential Privacy on Neural Network Designcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
3 papers.