mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

XRL-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating and Comparing Explainable Reinforcement Learning Techniques

arXiv 2402.12685 ↗First posted 20 Feb 2024cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has demonstrated substantial potential across diverse fields, yet understanding its decision-making process, especially in real-world scenarios where rationality and safety are paramount, is an ongoing challenge. This paper delves in to Explainable RL (XRL), a subfield of Explainable AI (XAI) aimed at unravelling the complexities of RL models. Our focus rests on state-explaining techniques, a crucial subset within XRL methods, as they reveal the underlying factors influencing an agent's actions at any given time. Despite their significant role, the lack of a unified evaluation framework hinders assessment of their accuracy and effectiveness. To address this, we introduce XRL-Bench, a unified standardized benchmark tailored for the evaluation and comparison of XRL methods, encompassing three main modules: standard RL environments, explainers based on state importance, and standard evaluators. XRL-Bench supports both tabular and image data for state explanation. We also propose TabularSHAP, an innovative and competitive XRL method. We demonstrate the practical utility of TabularSHAP in real-world online gaming services and offer an open-source benchmark platform for the straightforward implementation and evaluation of XRL methods. Our contributions facilitate the continued progression of XRL technology.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Feb 2024.

Builds on

43 of 65 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  5. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  6. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  7. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  8. 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
  9. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  10. 2020Sim-to-Real Transfer in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotics: a Surveycited by 388
  11. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  12. 2018Learning to Explain: An Information-Theoretic Perspective on Model Interpretationcited by 248
31 more
  1. 2018Techniques for Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 237
  2. 2019Explainable Reinforcement Learning Through a Causal Lenscited by 177
  3. 2018Verifiable Reinforcement Learning via Policy Extractioncited by 176
  4. 2021Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning with Context-based Representationscited by 169
  5. 2019Mastering Complex Control in MOBA Games with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 150
  6. 2017Visualizing and Understanding Atari Agentscited by 141
  7. 2020Explainable Reinforcement Learning: A Surveycited by 139
  8. 2019Language as an Abstraction for Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 138
  9. 2022OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanationscited by 125
  10. 2018Model Agnostic Supervised Local Explanationscited by 83
  11. 2019Automated Rationale Generation: A Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptionscited by 81
  12. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
  13. 2017Hierarchical and Interpretable Skill Acquisition in Multi-task Reinforcement Learningcited by 77
  14. 2018SDRL: Interpretable and Data-efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning Leveraging Symbolic Planningcited by 77
  15. 2019Shapley Q-value: A Local Reward Approach to Solve Global Reward Gamescited by 71
  16. 2019Neural Logic Reinforcement Learningcited by 53
  17. 2017The Promise and Peril of Human Evaluation for Model Interpretabilitycited by 52
  18. 2019Explain Your Move: Understanding Agent Actions Using Specific and Relevant Feature Attributioncited by 50
  19. 2021The Sensory Neuron as a Transformer: Permutation-Invariant Neural Networks for Reinforcement Learningcited by 50
  20. 2017Interpretable Policies for Reinforcement Learning by Genetic Programmingcited by 47
  21. 2020A Boolean Task Algebra for Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
  22. 2021ELLA: Exploration through Learned Language Abstractioncited by 42
  23. 2018Transparency and Explanation in Deep Reinforcement Learning Neural Networkscited by 40
  24. 2022Fairness via Explanation Quality: Evaluating Disparities in the Quality of Post hoc Explanationscited by 40
  25. 2019Social Attention for Autonomous Decision-Making in Dense Trafficcited by 39
  26. 2021Counterfactual State Explanations for Reinforcement Learning Agents via Generative Deep Learningcited by 38
  27. 2023Explainable Deep Reinforcement Learning: State of the Art and Challengescited by 33
  28. 2019Improving performance of deep learning models with axiomatic attribution priors and expected gradientscited by 32
  29. 2022A Survey of Explainable Reinforcement Learningcited by 31
  30. 2020Incorporating Relational Background Knowledge into Reinforcement Learning via Differentiable Inductive Logic Programmingcited by 12
  31. 2018Autonomous Self-Explanation of Behavior for Interactive Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.