mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Anomaly Detection Algorithms: Deep Learning and Beyond

arXiv 2402.07281 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detection of anomalous situations for complex mission-critical systems hold paramount importance when their service continuity needs to be ensured. A major challenge in detecting anomalies from the operational data arises due to the imbalanced class distribution problem since the anomalies are supposed to be rare events. This paper evaluates a diverse array of Machine Learning (ML)-based anomaly detection algorithms through a comprehensive benchmark study. The paper contributes significantly by conducting an unbiased comparison of various anomaly detection algorithms, spanning classical ML, including various tree-based approaches to Deep Learning (DL) and outlier detection methods. The inclusion of 104 publicly available enhances the diversity of the study, allowing a more realistic evaluation of algorithm performance and emphasizing the importance of adaptability to real-world scenarios. The paper evaluates the general notion of DL as a universal solution, showing that, while powerful, it is not always the best fit for every scenario. The findings reveal that recently proposed tree-based evolutionary algorithms match DL methods and sometimes outperform them in many instances of univariate data where the size of the data is small and number of anomalies are less than 10%. Specifically, tree-based approaches successfully detect singleton anomalies in datasets where DL falls short. To the best of the authors' knowledge, such a study on a large number of state-of-the-art algorithms using diverse data sets, with the objective of guiding researchers and practitioners in making informed algorithmic choices, has not been attempted earlier.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2024.

Builds on

22 of 66 references.

References · 22

  1. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  2. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  3. 2019Deep Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 357
  4. 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 300
  5. 2019Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 290
  6. 2019Progressive Image Deraining Networks: A Better and Simpler Baselinecited by 271
  7. 2022ADBench: Anomaly Detection Benchmarkcited by 230
  8. 2019PyOD: A Python Toolbox for Scalable Outlier Detectioncited by 221
  9. 2019Deep Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networkscited by 152
  10. 2023Deep Industrial Image Anomaly Detection: A Surveycited by 147
  11. 2021Towards a Rigorous Evaluation of Time-series Anomaly Detectioncited by 95
  12. 2022Deep Isolation Forest for Anomaly Detectioncited by 90
10 more
  1. 2022Local Evaluation of Time Series Anomaly Detection Algorithmscited by 79
  2. 2020Exathlon: A Benchmark for Explainable Anomaly Detection over Time Seriescited by 56
  3. 2018An overview of deep learning based methods for unsupervised and semi-supervised anomaly detection in videoscited by 45
  4. 2020Benchmarking Unsupervised Outlier Detection with Realistic Synthetic Datacited by 25
  5. 2016How to Evaluate the Quality of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms?cited by 22
  6. 2022A Survey on Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Industrial Imagescited by 21
  7. 2020Real-World Anomaly Detection by using Digital Twin Systems and Weakly-Supervised Learningcited by 17
  8. 2018Distributed Anomaly Detection using Autoencoder Neural Networks in WSN for IoTcited by 16
  9. 2022TiSAT: Time Series Anomaly Transformercited by 15
  10. 2021Anomaly Detection: How to Artificially Increase your F1-Score with a Biased Evaluation Protocolcited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.