mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TWIG: Towards pre-hoc Hyperparameter Optimisation and Cross-Graph Generalisation via Simulated KGE Models

arXiv 2402.06097 ↗First posted 8 Feb 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper we introduce TWIG (Topologically-Weighted Intelligence Generation), a novel, embedding-free paradigm for simulating the output of KGEs that uses a tiny fraction of the parameters. TWIG learns weights from inputs that consist of topological features of the graph data, with no coding for latent representations of entities or edges. Our experiments on the UMLS dataset show that a single TWIG neural network can predict the results of state-of-the-art ComplEx-N3 KGE model nearly exactly on across all hyperparameter configurations. To do this it uses a total of 2590 learnable parameters, but accurately predicts the results of 1215 different hyperparameter combinations with a combined cost of 29,322,000 parameters. Based on these results, we make two claims: 1) that KGEs do not learn latent semantics, but only latent representations of structural patterns; 2) that hyperparameter choice in KGEs is a deterministic function of the KGE model and graph structure. We further hypothesise that, as TWIG can simulate KGEs without embeddings, that node and edge embeddings are not needed to learn to accurately predict new facts in KGs. Finally, we formulate all of our findings under the umbrella of the ``Structural Generalisation Hypothesis", which suggests that ``twiggy" embedding-free / data-structure-based learning methods can allow a single neural network to simulate KGE performance, and perhaps solve the Link Prediction task, across many KGs from diverse domains and with different semantics.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.

Builds on

17 of 35 references.

References · 17

  1. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  2. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  3. 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 619
  4. 2015A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphscited by 264
  5. 2020Iterative Deep Graph Learning for Graph Neural Networks: Better and Robust Node Embeddingscited by 212
  6. 2018Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completioncited by 150
  7. 2021NodePiece: Compositional and Parameter-Efficient Representations of Large Knowledge Graphscited by 71
  8. 2020Bringing Light Into the Dark: A Large-scale Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Embedding Models Under a Unified Frameworkcited by 70
  9. 2019Data Poisoning Attack against Knowledge Graph Embeddingcited by 34
  10. 2020Co-embedding of Nodes and Edges with Graph Neural Networkscited by 30
  11. 2019OpenBioLink: A benchmarking framework for large-scale biomedical link predictioncited by 28
  12. 2021Neural Multi-Hop Reasoning With Logical Rules on Biomedical Knowledge Graphscited by 25
5 more
  1. 2017Analysis of the Impact of Negative Sampling on Link Prediction in Knowledge Graphscited by 22
  2. 2021Adversarial Attacks on Knowledge Graph Embeddings via Instance Attribution Methodscited by 16
  3. 2020Knowledge Base Completion: Baseline strikes back (Again)cited by 12
  4. 2021Implications of Topological Imbalance for Representation Learning on Biomedical Knowledge Graphscited by 11
  5. 2020Explaining Neural Matrix Factorization with Gradient Rollbackcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.