mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latent Plan Transformer for Trajectory Abstraction: Planning as Latent Space Inference

arXiv 2402.04647 ↗First posted 7 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In tasks aiming for long-term returns, planning becomes essential. We study generative modeling for planning with datasets repurposed from offline reinforcement learning. Specifically, we identify temporal consistency in the absence of step-wise rewards as one key technical challenge. We introduce the Latent Plan Transformer (LPT), a novel model that leverages a latent variable to connect a Transformer-based trajectory generator and the final return. LPT can be learned with maximum likelihood estimation on trajectory-return pairs. In learning, posterior sampling of the latent variable naturally integrates sub-trajectories to form a consistent abstraction despite the finite context. At test time, the latent variable is inferred from an expected return before policy execution, realizing the idea of planning as inference. Our experiments demonstrate that LPT can discover improved decisions from sub-optimal trajectories, achieving competitive performance across several benchmarks, including Gym-Mujoco, Franka Kitchen, Maze2D, and Connect Four. It exhibits capabilities in nuanced credit assignments, trajectory stitching, and adaptation to environmental contingencies. These results validate that latent variable inference can be a strong alternative to step-wise reward prompting.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.

Builds on

33 of 43 references.

References · 33

  1. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 20,851
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,185
  4. 2022Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidancecited by 5,717
  5. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
  6. 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
  7. 2021Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modelingcited by 1,528
  8. 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
  9. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
  10. 2022Planning with Diffusion for Flexible Behavior Synthesiscited by 1,023
  11. 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
  12. 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling Problemcited by 636
21 more
  1. 2019Learning Latent Plans from Playcited by 310
  2. 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 267
  3. 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
  4. 2022Multi-Game Decision Transformerscited by 212
  5. 2021RvS: What is Essential for Offline RL via Supervised Learning?cited by 184
  6. 2016A Theory of Generative ConvNetcited by 174
  7. 2020OPAL: Offline Primitive Discovery for Accelerating Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 164
  8. 2021Pessimistic Model-based Offline Reinforcement Learning under Partial Coveragecited by 160
  9. 2016Why is Posterior Sampling Better than Optimism for Reinforcement Learning?cited by 116
  10. 2022Adversarially Trained Actor Critic for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 111
  11. 2020Learning Latent Space Energy-Based Prior Modelcited by 104
  12. 2022Q-learning Decision Transformer: Leveraging Dynamic Programming for Conditional Sequence Modelling in Offline RLcited by 103
  13. 2022When does return-conditioned supervised learning work for offline reinforcement learning?cited by 73
  14. 2022You Can't Count on Luck: Why Decision Transformers and RvS Fail in Stochastic Environmentscited by 62
  15. 2022Efficient Planning in a Compact Latent Action Spacecited by 57
  16. 2022Dichotomy of Control: Separating What You Can Control from What You Cannotcited by 47
  17. 2022Addressing Optimism Bias in Sequence Modeling for Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  18. 2022Imitating Past Successes can be Very Suboptimalcited by 20
  19. 2022Upside-Down Reinforcement Learning Can Diverge in Stochastic Environments With Episodic Resetscited by 10
  20. 2023Molecule Design by Latent Prompt Transformercited by 8
  21. 2023A Tale of Two Latent Flows: Learning Latent Space Normalizing Flow with Short-run Langevin Flow for Approximate Inferencecited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026How Long, Not How Close: A Learned Temporal Metric for Planning in Latent World Models
  2. 2019Learning Dynamics Model in Reinforcement Learning by Incorporating the Long Term Future
  3. 2026Ada-Diffuser: Latent-Aware Adaptive Diffusion for Decision-Making
  4. 2026Latent Goal Prediction from Language for Model-Based Planning
  5. 2026Beyond a single latent space: a dual-latent world model for long-horizon planning
  6. 2026Latent Geometry Beyond Search: Amortizing Planning in World Models
  7. 2023Efficient Planning with Latent Diffusion
  8. 2026SAGE: Subgoal-Conditioned Action Generation for Latent World Model Planning