mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models

arXiv 2402.03845 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 21

On the map: Diffusion models → Diffusion foundations and sampling

Abstract (arXiv)

Diffusion models are generative models that have recently demonstrated impressive performances in terms of sampling quality and density estimation in high dimensions. They rely on a forward continuous diffusion process and a backward continuous denoising process, which can be described by a time-dependent vector field and is used as a generative model. In the original formulation of the diffusion model, this vector field is assumed to be the score function (i.e. it is the gradient of the log-probability at a given time in the diffusion process). Curiously, on the practical side, most studies on diffusion models implement this vector field as a neural network function and do not constrain it be the gradient of some energy function (that is, most studies do not constrain the vector field to be conservative). Even though some studies investigated empirically whether such a constraint will lead to a performance gain, they lead to contradicting results and failed to provide analytical results. Here, we provide three analytical results regarding the extent of the modeling freedom of this vector field. {Firstly, we propose a novel decomposition of vector fields into a conservative component and an orthogonal component which satisfies a given (gauge) freedom. Secondly, from this orthogonal decomposition, we show that exact density estimation and exact sampling is achieved when the conservative component is exactly equals to the true score and therefore conservativity is neither necessary nor sufficient to obtain exact density estimation and exact sampling. Finally, we show that when it comes to inferring local information of the data manifold, constraining the vector field to be conservative is desirable.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion foundations and sampling, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models. Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Compositional Generation with Energy-Based Diffusion Models and MCMC22 Feb
  2. 2022Your diffusion model secretly knows the dimension of the data manifold23 Dec
  3. 2022On Investigating the Conservative Property of Score-Based Generative Models26 Sep
  4. 2022Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications2 Sep
  5. 2020Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations26 Nov

Other references · 15

  1. 2015Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamicscited by 7,005
  2. 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
  3. 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,067
  4. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  5. 2022Compositional Visual Generation with Composable Diffusion Modelscited by 619
  6. 2022Action Matching: Learning Stochastic Dynamics from Samplescited by 94
  7. 2019Robust and interpretable blind image denoising via bias-free convolutional neural networkscited by 87
  8. 2023Two for One: Diffusion Models and Force Fields for Coarse-Grained Molecular Dynamicscited by 72
  9. 2022LIDL: Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Using Approximate Likelihoodcited by 30
  10. 2019On approximating nabla f with neural networkscited by 18
  11. 2015Large-scale Log-determinant Computation through Stochastic Chebyshev Expansionscited by 17
  12. 2015Conservativeness of untied auto-encoderscited by 4
3 more
  1. 2022Generalizing and Improving Jacobian and Hessian Regularizationcited by 2
  2. 2019Gauge Freedom within the Class of Linear Feedback Particle Filterscited by 1
  3. 2023How to Construct Energy for Images? Denoising Autoencoder Can Be Energy Based Modelcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 10; 2026: 3.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Deep Generative Models through the Lens of the Manifold Hypothesis: A Survey and New Connectionscited by 47
  2. 2024A Geometric View of Data Complexity: Efficient Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation with Diffusion Modelscited by 41
  3. 2024A Geometric Framework for Understanding Memorization in Generative Modelscited by 40
  4. 2024Manifolds, Random Matrices and Spectral Gaps: The geometric phases of generative diffusioncited by 31
  5. 2024Losing dimensions: Geometric memorization in generative diffusioncited by 28
  6. 2024Understanding and Mitigating Memorization in Generative Models via Sharpness of Probability Landscapescited by 20
  7. 2025Composition and Control with Distilled Energy Diffusion Models and Sequential Monte Carlocited by 18
  8. 2025Learning normalized image densities via dual score matchingcited by 17
  9. 2025Improving the Euclidean Diffusion Generation of Manifold Data by Mitigating Score Function Singularitycited by 14
  10. 2025Combining complex Langevin dynamics with score-based and energy-based diffusion modelscited by 5
  11. 2025Image Interpolation with Score-based Riemannian Metrics of Diffusion Modelscited by 4
  12. 2025Sparse Autoencoders, Again?cited by 3
9 more
  1. 2025Minimal Impact ControlNet: Advancing Multi-ControlNet Integrationcited by 2
  2. 2025On Convolutions, Intrinsic Dimension, and Diffusion Modelscited by 2
  3. 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplerscited by 2
  4. 2024A Wiener Process Perspective on Local Intrinsic Dimension Estimation Methodscited by 1
  5. 2024Classification-Denoising Networkscited by 1
  6. 2025Be Tangential to Manifold: Discovering Riemannian Metric for Diffusion Modelscited by 1
  7. 2026Diffusion Models Observe Only Gradients: A Geometric Perspective on Score Matching Errorscited by 1
  8. 2026Generative Modeling with Flux Matchingcited by 0
  9. 2026One Inverse Step is a Convex Program: Bayes-Limit Calibration of Diffusion Inversioncited by 0

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Are We Really Learning the Score Function? Reinterpreting Diffusion Models Through Wasserstein Gradient Flow Matching
  2. 2025Optimization-Free Diffusion Model -- A Perturbation Theory Approach
  3. 2023Infinite-Dimensional Diffusion Models
  4. 2026A Tutorial on Diffusion Theory: From Differential Equations to Diffusion Models
  5. 2025Unifying and extending Diffusion Models through PDEs for solving Inverse Problems
  6. 2025Diffusion Models: A Mathematical Introduction
  7. 2025Kernel-Smoothed Scores for Denoising Diffusion: A Bias-Variance Study
  8. 2022A Flexible Diffusion Model