Conservativeness of untied auto-encoders
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We discuss necessary and sufficient conditions for an auto-encoder to define a conservative vector field, in which case it is associated with an energy function akin to the unnormalized log-probability of the data. We show that the conditions for conservativeness are more general than for encoder and decoder weights to be the same ("tied weights"), and that they also depend on the form of the hidden unit activation function, but that contractive training criteria, such as denoising, will enforce these conditions locally. Based on these observations, we show how we can use auto-encoders to extract the conservative component of a vector field.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2015.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion modelscited by 22
- 2022On Investigating the Conservative Property of Score-Based Generative Modelscited by 16
- 2026Thinking with Looped Flowscited by 7
- 2026Understanding Differentiable Embeddings Through Differential and Integral Geometrycited by 0
- 2026Thinking with Looped Flows10 Sep 2026
- 2026Understanding Differentiable Embeddings Through Differential and Integral Geometry7 Aug 2026
- 2024On gauge freedom, conservativity and intrinsic dimensionality estimation in diffusion models6 Feb 2024
- 2022On Investigating the Conservative Property of Score-Based Generative Models26 Sep 2022