mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Probabilistic Model Behind Self-Supervised Learning

arXiv 2402.01399 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In self-supervised learning (SSL), representations are learned via an auxiliary task without annotated labels. A common task is to classify augmentations or different modalities of the data, which share semantic content (e.g. an object in an image) but differ in style (e.g. the object's location). Many approaches to self-supervised learning have been proposed, e.g. SimCLR, CLIP, and DINO, which have recently gained much attention for their representations achieving downstream performance comparable to supervised learning. However, a theoretical understanding of self-supervised methods eludes. Addressing this, we present a generative latent variable model for self-supervised learning and show that several families of discriminative SSL, including contrastive methods, induce a comparable distribution over representations, providing a unifying theoretical framework for these methods. The proposed model also justifies connections drawn to mutual information and the use of a ''projection head''. Learning representations by fitting the model generatively (termed SimVAE) improves performance over discriminative and other VAE-based methods on simple image benchmarks and significantly narrows the gap between generative and discriminative representation learning in more complex settings. Importantly, as our analysis predicts, SimVAE outperforms self-supervised learning where style information is required, taking an important step toward understanding self-supervised methods and achieving task-agnostic representations.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.

Builds on

64 of 79 references.

References · 64

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  4. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,339
  7. 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
  8. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
  9. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  10. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  11. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,853
  12. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
38 more
  1. 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
  2. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  3. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  4. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,838
  5. 2018Unsupervised Representation Learning by Predicting Image Rotationscited by 1,586
  6. 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,393
  7. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,265
  8. 2021SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modelingcited by 1,147
  9. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,020
  10. 2021VICReg: Variance-Invariance-Covariance Regularization for Self-Supervised Learningcited by 1,013
  11. 2019Self-Supervised Learning of Pretext-Invariant Representationscited by 806
  12. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 763
  13. 2019Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Viewscited by 733
  14. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 713
  15. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 550
  16. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  17. 2016Ladder Variational Autoencoderscited by 315
  18. 2019On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learningcited by 315
  19. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
  20. 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 308
  21. 2014Discriminative Unsupervised Feature Learning with Exemplar Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 299
  22. 2023A Cookbook of Self-Supervised Learningcited by 248
  23. 2016Towards K-means-friendly Spaces: Simultaneous Deep Learning and Clusteringcited by 237
  24. 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 220
  25. 2018Formal Limitations on the Measurement of Mutual Informationcited by 189
  26. 2020Predicting What You Already Know Helps: Provable Self-Supervised Learningcited by 152
  27. 2021Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, Advances and Challengescited by 147
  28. 2020Contrastive learning, multi-view redundancy, and linear modelscited by 146
  29. 2016Discrete Variational Autoencoderscited by 124
  30. 2016Towards a Neural Statisticiancited by 119
  31. 2022On the duality between contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learningcited by 107
  32. 2022Chaos is a Ladder: A New Theoretical Understanding of Contrastive Learning via Augmentation Overlapcited by 105
  33. 2021D2C: Diffusion-Denoising Models for Few-shot Conditional Generationcited by 96
  34. 2022Understanding Contrastive Learning Requires Incorporating Inductive Biasescited by 96
  35. 2015Hierarchical Variational Modelscited by 89
  36. 2023Image Captioners Are Scalable Vision Learners Toocited by 89
  37. 2019Analogies Explained: Towards Understanding Word Embeddingscited by 63
  38. 2023Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 58

50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

5 papers.