Predictive Self-Supervised Learning Provably Identifies Stochastic Signals under Nuisance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Self-supervised learning (SSL) by predicting in latent space, without generating the input data itself, learns highly abstract, useful representations. Intuitively, this success is often attributed to its ability to discard nuisance information that is irrelevant to prediction. However, this poses a conundrum: both stochastic variation in a prediction-relevant latent signal and true nuisance make observations partly unpredictable; how could they be distinguished? Surprisingly, we prove that common SSL methods can achieve exactly this, by implicitly instantiating a latent-variable model with stochastic dynamics and observation-private nuisance. We trace their ability to recover the stochastic signal to two complementary principles: Predictive mutual information maximization ensures that representations retain the information needed for prediction, while latent distribution matching constrains how this information is encoded, thereby making the retained signal identifiable. We confirm this identifiability result in simulations for Gaussian predictors, which recover the true signal up to an affine transformation even in dynamic, nuisance-laden environments.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
27 of 31 references.
References · 27
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
- 2020Understanding Contrastive Representation Learning through Alignment and Uniformity on the Hyperspherecited by 1,405
- 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,382
- 2019Contrastive Multiview Codingcited by 1,301
- 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 559
- 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
- 2019Variational Autoencoders and Nonlinear ICA: A Unifying Frameworkcited by 503
- 2019On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learningcited by 316
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
- 2018Nonlinear ICA Using Auxiliary Variables and Generalized Contrastive Learningcited by 282
- 2021Contrastive Learning Inverts the Data Generating Processcited by 221
15 more
- 2023A Survey on Self-supervised Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Future Trendscited by 207
- 2020On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representationscited by 105
- 2019The Incomplete Rosetta Stone Problem: Identifiability Results for Multi-View Nonlinear ICAcited by 86
- 2023To Compress or Not to Compress- Self-Supervised Learning and Information Theory: A Reviewcited by 72
- 2023Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 61
- 2023Introduction to Latent Variable Energy-Based Models: A Path Towards Autonomous Machine Intelligencecited by 56
- 2025Latent Action Learning Requires Supervision in the Presence of Distractorscited by 44
- 2021Understanding Latent Correlation-Based Multiview Learning and Self-Supervision: An Identifiability Perspectivecited by 37
- 2023Reverse Engineering Self-Supervised Learningcited by 33
- 2022Representation Uncertainty in Self-Supervised Learning as Variational Inferencecited by 22
- 2023The Role of Entropy and Reconstruction in Multi-View Self-Supervised Learningcited by 13
- 2021InfoNCE is variational inference in a recognition parameterised modelcited by 10
- 2024Self-supervised contrastive learning performs non-linear system identificationcited by 9
- 2024A Probabilistic Model Behind Self-Supervised Learningcited by 5
- 2026Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Latent Distribution Matchingcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.