mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Self-Supervised Learning via Gaussian Mixture Models

arXiv 2411.03517 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2024cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Self-supervised learning attempts to learn representations from un-labeled data; it does so via a loss function that encourages the embedding of a point to be close to that of its augmentations. This simple idea performs remarkably well, yet it is not precisely theoretically understood why this is the case. In this paper we analyze self-supervised learning in a natural context: dimensionality reduction in Gaussian Mixture Models. Crucially, we define an augmentation of a data point as being another independent draw from the same underlying mixture component. We show that vanilla contrastive learning (specifically, the InfoNCE loss) is able to find the optimal lower-dimensional subspace even when the Gaussians are not isotropic -- something that vanilla spectral techniques cannot do. We also prove a similar result for "non-contrastive" self-supervised learning (i.e., SimSiam loss). We further extend our analyses to multi-modal contrastive learning algorithms (e.g., CLIP). In this setting we show that contrastive learning learns the subset of fisher-optimal subspace, effectively filtering out all the noise from the learnt representations. Finally, we corroborate our theoretical finding through synthetic data experiments.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2024.

Builds on

22 of 31 references.

References · 22

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,662
  4. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  6. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,853
  7. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,845
  8. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
  9. 2021Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learningcited by 1,203
  10. 2019A Theoretical Analysis of Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learningcited by 530
  11. 2021Understanding Dimensional Collapse in Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 374
  12. 2021Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive Losscited by 311
10 more
  1. 2021Understanding self-supervised Learning Dynamics without Contrastive Pairscited by 254
  2. 2022Understanding Contrastive Learning Requires Incorporating Inductive Biasescited by 96
  3. 2022On the Importance of Asymmetry for Siamese Representation Learningcited by 38
  4. 2022The Mechanism of Prediction Head in Non-contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 38
  5. 2022A Theoretical Study of Inductive Biases in Contrastive Learningcited by 38
  6. 2023InfoNCE Loss Provably Learns Cluster-Preserving Representationscited by 37
  7. 2022Contrastive Learning Can Find An Optimal Basis For Approximately View-Invariant Functionscited by 32
  8. 2023Understanding Augmentation-based Self-Supervised Representation Learning via RKHS Approximation and Regressioncited by 20
  9. 2020Faster DBSCAN via subsampled similarity queriescited by 7
  10. 2024A Probabilistic Model Behind Self-Supervised Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.