Prosody in Cascade and Direct Speech-to-Text Translation: a case study on Korean Wh-Phrases
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Speech-to-Text Translation (S2TT) has typically been addressed with cascade systems, where speech recognition systems generate a transcription that is subsequently passed to a translation model. While there has been a growing interest in developing direct speech translation systems to avoid propagating errors and losing non-verbal content, prior work in direct S2TT has struggled to conclusively establish the advantages of integrating the acoustic signal directly into the translation process. This work proposes using contrastive evaluation to quantitatively measure the ability of direct S2TT systems to disambiguate utterances where prosody plays a crucial role. Specifically, we evaluated Korean-English translation systems on a test set containing wh-phrases, for which prosodic features are necessary to produce translations with the correct intent, whether it's a statement, a yes/no question, a wh-question, and more. Our results clearly demonstrate the value of direct translation systems over cascade translation models, with a notable 12.9% improvement in overall accuracy in ambiguous cases, along with up to a 15.6% increase in F1 scores for one of the major intent categories. To the best of our knowledge, this work stands as the first to provide quantitative evidence that direct S2TT models can effectively leverage prosody. The code for our evaluation is openly accessible and freely available for review and utilisation.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Feb 2024.
Builds on
11 of 19 references.
References · 11
- 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 3,972
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
- 2020fairseq S2T: Fast Speech-to-Text Modeling with fairseqcited by 174
- 2020The Tatoeba Translation Challenge -- Realistic Data Sets for Low Resource and Multilingual MTcited by 127
- 2020Speech Translation and the End-to-End Promise: Taking Stock of Where We Arecited by 77
- 2021Cascade versus Direct Speech Translation: Do the Differences Still Make a Difference?cited by 54
- 2016How Grammatical is Character-level Neural Machine Translation? Assessing MT Quality with Contrastive Translation Pairscited by 39
- 2021On the Limits of Minimal Pairs in Contrastive Evaluationcited by 15
- 2020ClovaCall: Korean Goal-Oriented Dialog Speech Corpus for Automatic Speech Recognition of Contact Centerscited by 13
- 2021Kosp2e: Korean Speech to English Translation Corpuscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Speech Translation with Speech Foundation Models and Large Language Models: What is There and What is Missing?cited by 23
- 2025BeaverTalk: Oregon State University's IWSLT 2025 Simultaneous Speech Translation Systemcited by 1
- 2026Is Prosody Lost in Translation? Fine-Grained Cross-Lingual Prosody Similarity Across Languagescited by 1
- 2025The Prosody of Emojiscited by 0
- 2026Reading the Mood Behind Words: Integrating Prosody-Derived Emotional Context into Socially Responsive VR Agentscited by 0
- 2026Is Prosody Lost in Translation? Fine-Grained Cross-Lingual Prosody Similarity Across Languages28 Aug 2026
- 2026Reading the Mood Behind Words: Integrating Prosody-Derived Emotional Context into Socially Responsive VR Agents10 Mar 2026
- 2025The Prosody of Emojis1 Aug 2025
- 2025BeaverTalk: Oregon State University's IWSLT 2025 Simultaneous Speech Translation System29 May 2025
- 2024Speech Translation with Speech Foundation Models and Large Language Models: What is There and What is Missing?19 Feb 2024