mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Scheduled Curiosity-Deep Dyna-Q: Efficient Exploration for Dialog Policy Learning

arXiv 2402.00085 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training task-oriented dialog agents based on reinforcement learning is time-consuming and requires a large number of interactions with real users. How to grasp dialog policy within limited dialog experiences remains an obstacle that makes the agent training process less efficient. In addition, most previous frameworks start training by randomly choosing training samples, which differs from the human learning method and hurts the efficiency and stability of training. Therefore, we propose Scheduled Curiosity-Deep Dyna-Q (SC-DDQ), a curiosity-driven curriculum learning framework based on a state-of-the-art model-based reinforcement learning dialog model, Deep Dyna-Q (DDQ). Furthermore, we designed learning schedules for SC-DDQ and DDQ, respectively, following two opposite training strategies: classic curriculum learning and its reverse version. Our results show that by introducing scheduled learning and curiosity, the new framework leads to a significant improvement over the DDQ and Deep Q-learning(DQN). Surprisingly, we found that traditional curriculum learning was not always effective. Specifically, according to the experimental results, the easy-first and difficult-first strategies are more suitable for SC-DDQ and DDQ. To analyze our results, we adopted the entropy of sampled actions to depict action exploration and found that training strategies with high entropy in the first stage and low entropy in the last stage lead to better performance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2024.

Builds on

18 of 41 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,173
  2. 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 632
  3. 2016#Exploration: A Study of Count-Based Exploration for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 307
  4. 2019On The Power of Curriculum Learning in Training Deep Networkscited by 285
  5. 2019Competence-based Curriculum Learning for Neural Machine Translationcited by 201
  6. 2017Active Bias: Training More Accurate Neural Networks by Emphasizing High Variance Samplescited by 147
  7. 2019What makes a good conversation? How controllable attributes affect human judgmentscited by 140
  8. 2020Recent Advances and Challenges in Task-oriented Dialog Systemcited by 78
  9. 2019Simple and Effective Curriculum Pointer-Generator Networks for Reading Comprehension over Long Narrativescited by 59
  10. 2020Curriculum Pre-training for End-to-End Speech Translationcited by 57
  11. 2016A User Simulator for Task-Completion Dialoguescited by 56
  12. 2018Microsoft Dialogue Challenge: Building End-to-End Task-Completion Dialogue Systemscited by 46
6 more
  1. 2017BBQ-Networks: Efficient Exploration in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Task-Oriented Dialogue Systemscited by 30
  2. 2018Deep Dyna-Q: Integrating Planning for Task-Completion Dialogue Policy Learningcited by 21
  3. 2020Reinforced Curriculum Learning on Pre-trained Neural Machine Translation Modelscited by 20
  4. 2018Switch-based Active Deep Dyna-Q: Efficient Adaptive Planning for Task-Completion Dialogue Policy Learningcited by 12
  5. 2020Automatic Curriculum Learning With Over-repetition Penalty for Dialogue Policy Learningcited by 8
  6. 2020Learning from Easy to Complex: Adaptive Multi-curricula Learning for Neural Dialogue Generationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.