How Useful is Continued Pre-Training for Generative Unsupervised Domain Adaptation?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent breakthroughs in scale have enabled the emergence of powerful generative language models, and the ability to fine-tune these models on various tasks by casting them into prompts or instructions. In this landscape, the problem of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA), or the problem of leveraging knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain, has been left behind, with recent UDA methods still addressing discriminative classification. In particular, two popular UDA approaches, involving Continued Pre-Training (CPT) and learning domain invariant representations, have been under-explored in the generative setting, signaling a gap. In this work, we evaluate the utility of CPT for generative UDA. We first perform an empirical evaluation to measure the trade-offs between CPT and strong methods promoting domain invariance. We further evaluate how well the benefits of CPT extend to different architectures, tuning methods and data regimes. We then motivate the use of CPT by studying to what degree it benefits classification performance on the target domain. Finally, we attempt to understand the mechanism behind which CPT improves classification performance on the unlabeled target domain. Our findings suggest that a implicitly learns the downstream task while predicting masked words informative to that task. Our work connects the body of UDA research with that of instruction tuning, enabling an initial step towards a wider applicability of modern language models.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 59 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2024.
Builds on
59 of 84 references.
References · 59
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
38 more
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2022BLOOM: A 176B-Parameter Open-Access Multilingual Language Modelcited by 1,968
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,935
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
- 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,548
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2022Editing Models with Task Arithmeticcited by 1,076
- 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 979
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2023Instruction Tuning for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 617
- 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 597
- 2020MAD-X: An Adapter-Based Framework for Multi-Task Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 443
- 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
- 2019MASS: Masked Sequence to Sequence Pre-training for Language Generationcited by 345
- 2016Domain Separation Networkscited by 317
- 2022PromptSource: An Integrated Development Environment and Repository for Natural Language Promptscited by 288
- 2023Multilingual Machine Translation with Large Language Models: Empirical Results and Analysiscited by 156
- 2016Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 146
- 2020Neural Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in NLP---A Surveycited by 142
- 2022On the Effectiveness of Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 140
- 2022Should You Mask 15% in Masked Language Modeling?cited by 117
- 2019Unsupervised Domain Adaptation through Self-Supervisioncited by 116
- 2022Connect, Not Collapse: Explaining Contrastive Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 66
- 2017Learning to select data for transfer learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 64
- 2020PMI-Masking: Principled masking of correlated spanscited by 54
- 2020Trust Issues: Uncertainty Estimation Does Not Enable Reliable OOD Detection On Medical Tabular Datacited by 52
- 2020Train No Evil: Selective Masking for Task-Guided Pre-Trainingcited by 36
- 2020PERL: Pivot-based Domain Adaptation for Pre-trained Deep Contextualized Embedding Modelscited by 33
- 2021UDALM: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation through Language Modelingcited by 33
- 2020Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Text Classification via DistanceNet-Banditscited by 30
- 2023Is Fine-tuning Needed? Pre-trained Language Models Are Near Perfect for Out-of-Domain Detectioncited by 29
50 most cited of 59 All 59 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 78
- 2024Model Editing as a Robust and Denoised variant of DPO: A Case Study on Toxicitycited by 33
- 2025Does Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Improve the Robustness of Amortized Bayesian Inference? A Systematic Evaluationcited by 10
- 2024On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 8
- 2024Exploring Gen-AI applications in building research and industry: A reviewcited by 2
- 2025Does Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Improve the Robustness of Amortized Bayesian Inference? A Systematic Evaluation7 Feb 2025
- 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankings15 Oct 2024
- 2024Exploring Gen-AI applications in building research and industry: A review1 Oct 2024
- 2024Model Editing as a Robust and Denoised variant of DPO: A Case Study on Toxicity22 May 2024
- 2024On the Learnability of Out-of-distribution Detection7 Apr 2024