Distribution-Specific Auditing For Subgroup Fairness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the problem of auditing classifiers with the notion of statistical subgroup fairness. Kearns et al. (2018) has shown that the problem of auditing combinatorial subgroups fairness is as hard as agnostic learning. Essentially all work on remedying statistical measures of discrimination against subgroups assumes access to an oracle for this problem, despite the fact that no efficient algorithms are known for it. If we assume the data distribution is Gaussian, or even merely log-concave, then a recent line of work has discovered efficient agnostic learning algorithms for halfspaces. Unfortunately, the reduction of Kearns et al. was formulated in terms of weak, "distribution-free" learning, and thus did not establish a connection for families such as log-concave distributions. In this work, we give positive and negative results on auditing for Gaussian distributions: On the positive side, we present an alternative approach to leverage these advances in agnostic learning and thereby obtain the first polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for auditing nontrivial combinatorial subgroup fairness: we show how to audit statistical notions of fairness over homogeneous halfspace subgroups when the features are Gaussian. On the negative side, we find that under cryptographic assumptions, no polynomial-time algorithm can guarantee any nontrivial auditing, even under Gaussian feature distributions, for general halfspace subgroups.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2024.
Builds on
15 of 29 references.
References · 15
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2018An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learningcited by 81
- 2018Fairness Through Computationally-Bounded Awarenesscited by 55
- 2023Near-Optimal Cryptographic Hardness of Agnostically Learning Halfspaces and ReLU Regression under Gaussian Marginalscited by 31
- 2020Non-Convex SGD Learns Halfspaces with Adversarial Label Noisecited by 30
- 2022Testing distributional assumptions of learning algorithmscited by 30
- 2022A Moment-Matching Approach to Testable Learning and a New Characterization of Rademacher Complexitycited by 27
- 2022Continuous LWE is as Hard as LWE & Applications to Learning Gaussian Mixturescited by 26
- 2021Agnostic Proper Learning of Halfspaces under Gaussian Marginalscited by 21
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025Personalized Prediction By Learning Halfspace Reference Classes Under Well-Behaved Distributioncited by 1
- 2026Auditing Fairness under Model Updates: Fundamental Complexity and Property-Preserving Updatescited by 1
- 2026Learning Conditional Averagescited by 0
- 2026Near-Optimal Cryptographic Hardness of Learning With Homogeneous Halfspaces Under Gaussian Marginalscited by 0
- 2026Near-Optimal Cryptographic Hardness of Learning With Homogeneous Halfspaces Under Gaussian Marginals29 Apr 2026
- 2026Learning Conditional Averages12 Feb 2026
- 2026Auditing Fairness under Model Updates: Fundamental Complexity and Property-Preserving Updates9 Jan 2026
- 2025Personalized Prediction By Learning Halfspace Reference Classes Under Well-Behaved Distribution19 Sep 2025