mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multilingual Text-to-Image Generation Magnifies Gender Stereotypes and Prompt Engineering May Not Help You

arXiv 2401.16092 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.CL cs.CY cs.LGcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image generation models have recently achieved astonishing results in image quality, flexibility, and text alignment, and are consequently employed in a fast-growing number of applications. Through improvements in multilingual abilities, a larger community now has access to this technology. However, our results show that multilingual models suffer from significant gender biases just as monolingual models do. Furthermore, the natural expectation that multilingual models will provide similar results across languages does not hold up. Instead, there are important differences between languages. We propose a novel benchmark, MAGBIG, intended to foster research on gender bias in multilingual models. We use MAGBIG to investigate the effect of multilingualism on gender bias in T2I models. To this end, we construct multilingual prompts requesting portraits of people with a certain occupation or trait. Our results show that not only do models exhibit strong gender biases but they also behave differently across languages. Furthermore, we investigate prompt engineering strategies, such as indirect, neutral formulations, to mitigate these biases. Unfortunately, these approaches have limited success and result in worse text-to-image alignment. Consequently, we call for more research into diverse representations across languages in image generators, as well as into steerability to address biased model behavior.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

44 of 78 references.

References · 44

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
  3. 2022Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understandingcited by 6,322
  4. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,388
  5. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  6. 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
  7. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  8. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  9. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 657
  10. 2022Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Modelscited by 501
  11. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
  12. 2018Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyondcited by 434
32 more
  1. 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
  2. 2019Evaluating Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 247
  3. 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
  4. 2022Towards Robust Blind Face Restoration with Codebook Lookup Transformercited by 230
  5. 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 225
  6. 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
  7. 2023Holistic Evaluation of Text-To-Image Modelscited by 160
  8. 2020SimAlign: High Quality Word Alignments without Parallel Training Data using Static and Contextualized Embeddingscited by 155
  9. 2023Fair Diffusion: Instructing Text-to-Image Generation Models on Fairnesscited by 149
  10. 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
  11. 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
  12. 2021Evaluating CLIP: Towards Characterization of Broader Capabilities and Downstream Implicationscited by 128
  13. 2023Social Biases through the Text-to-Image Generation Lenscited by 126
  14. 2019It's All in the Name: Mitigating Gender Bias with Name-Based Counterfactual Data Substitutioncited by 102
  15. 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
  16. 2022How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions?cited by 92
  17. 2022AltCLIP: Altering the Language Encoder in CLIP for Extended Language Capabilitiescited by 84
  18. 2020Unmasking Contextual Stereotypes: Measuring and Mitigating BERT's Gender Biascited by 82
  19. 2022Democratizing Neural Machine Translation with OPUS-MTcited by 57
  20. 2020Gender Bias in Multilingual Embeddings and Cross-Lingual Transfercited by 55
  21. 2023Typology of Risks of Generative Text-to-Image Modelscited by 55
  22. 2023TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 51
  23. 2021Understanding and Mitigating Annotation Bias in Facial Expression Recognitioncited by 50
  24. 2023Improving Diversity of Demographic Representation in Large Language Models via Collective-Critiques and Self-Votingcited by 46
  25. 2022Contrastive Language-Vision AI Models Pretrained on Web-Scraped Multimodal Data Exhibit Sexual Objectification Biascited by 43
  26. 2023Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AIcited by 33
  27. 2023AltDiffusion: A Multilingual Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelcited by 30
  28. 2023What about em? How Commercial Machine Translation Fails to Handle (Neo-)Pronounscited by 19
  29. 2023Mitigating Inappropriateness in Image Generation: Can there be Value in Reflecting the World's Ugliness?cited by 16
  30. 2023MultiFusion: Fusing Pre-Trained Models for Multi-Lingual, Multi-Modal Image Generationcited by 14
  31. 2023Multilingual Conceptual Coverage in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 9
  32. 2024MiTTenS: A Dataset for Evaluating Gender Mistranslationcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: