A2C: A Modular Multi-stage Collaborative Decision Framework for Human-AI Teams
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces A2C, a multi-stage collaborative decision framework designed to enable robust decision-making within human-AI teams. Drawing inspiration from concepts such as rejection learning and learning to defer, A2C incorporates AI systems trained to recognise uncertainty in their decisions and defer to human experts when needed. Moreover, A2C caters to scenarios where even human experts encounter limitations, such as in incident detection and response in cyber Security Operations Centres (SOC). In such scenarios, A2C facilitates collaborative explorations, enabling collective resolution of complex challenges. With support for three distinct decision-making modes in human-AI teams: Automated, Augmented, and Collaborative, A2C offers a flexible platform for developing effective strategies for human-AI collaboration. By harnessing the strengths of both humans and AI, it significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of complex decision-making in dynamic and evolving environments. To validate A2C's capabilities, we conducted extensive simulative experiments using benchmark datasets. The results clearly demonstrate that all three modes of decision-making can be effectively supported by A2C. Most notably, collaborative exploration by (simulated) human experts and AI achieves superior performance compared to AI in isolation, underscoring the framework's potential to enhance decision-making within human-AI teams.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.
Builds on
17 of 49 references.
References · 17
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
- 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
- 2020Multiresolution Knowledge Distillation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 285
- 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
- 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
- 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 233
- 2020PANDA: Adapting Pretrained Features for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 175
- 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 127
- 2020DROCC: Deep Robust One-Class Classificationcited by 121
- 2020Old is Gold: Redefining the Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier Training Paradigmcited by 115
5 more
- 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 109
- 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
- 2016Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancercited by 93
- 2021Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Expertscited by 72
- 2019Regression Under Human Assistancecited by 40
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.
12 papers.
- 2025LLM-Based Human-Agent Collaboration and Interaction Systems: A Surveycited by 29
- 2025ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy Optimizationcited by 8
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Expertscited by 5
- 2026Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agentscited by 5
- 2025LLMs Are Not Yet Ready for Deepfake Image Detectioncited by 4
- 2025From Prediction to Explanation: Multimodal, Explainable, and Interactive Deepfake Detection Framework for Non-Expert Userscited by 2
- 2025Human-AI Collaboration in Cloud Security: Cognitive Hierarchy-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2026AI as Teammate or Tool? A Review of Human-AI Interaction in Decision Supportcited by 1
- 2026What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?cited by 1
- 2026Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 0
- 2026PLACO: A Multi-Stage Framework for Cost-Effective Performance in Human-AI Teamscited by 0
- 2026A Human-LLM Teaming Framework for Privacy Risk Analysis: An Illustration with CBDC-Based Welfare Schemescited by 0
- 2026A Human-LLM Teaming Framework for Privacy Risk Analysis: An Illustration with CBDC-Based Welfare Schemes17 Aug 2026
- 2026What Types of Human-AI Teams Exist?2 Jul 2026
- 2026PLACO: A Multi-Stage Framework for Cost-Effective Performance in Human-AI Teams8 May 2026
- 2026Modeling Distinct Human Interaction in Web Agents19 Feb 2026
- 2026Who Does What? Archetypes of Roles Assigned to LLMs During Human-AI Decision-Making12 Feb 2026
- 2026AI as Teammate or Tool? A Review of Human-AI Interaction in Decision Support26 Jan 2026
- 2025From Prediction to Explanation: Multimodal, Explainable, and Interactive Deepfake Detection Framework for Non-Expert Users11 Aug 2025
- 2025ReDit: Reward Dithering for Improved LLM Policy Optimization23 Jun 2025
- 2025LLMs Are Not Yet Ready for Deepfake Image Detection12 Jun 2025
- 2025LLM-Based Human-Agent Collaboration and Interaction Systems: A Survey1 May 2025
- 2025Human-AI Collaboration in Cloud Security: Cognitive Hierarchy-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning22 Feb 2025
- 2024Coverage-Constrained Human-AI Cooperation with Multiple Experts18 Nov 2024