mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A2C: A Modular Multi-stage Collaborative Decision Framework for Human-AI Teams

arXiv 2401.14432 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2024cs.HC cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper introduces A2C, a multi-stage collaborative decision framework designed to enable robust decision-making within human-AI teams. Drawing inspiration from concepts such as rejection learning and learning to defer, A2C incorporates AI systems trained to recognise uncertainty in their decisions and defer to human experts when needed. Moreover, A2C caters to scenarios where even human experts encounter limitations, such as in incident detection and response in cyber Security Operations Centres (SOC). In such scenarios, A2C facilitates collaborative explorations, enabling collective resolution of complex challenges. With support for three distinct decision-making modes in human-AI teams: Automated, Augmented, and Collaborative, A2C offers a flexible platform for developing effective strategies for human-AI collaboration. By harnessing the strengths of both humans and AI, it significantly improves the efficiency and effectiveness of complex decision-making in dynamic and evolving environments. To validate A2C's capabilities, we conducted extensive simulative experiments using benchmark datasets. The results clearly demonstrate that all three modes of decision-making can be effectively supported by A2C. Most notably, collaborative exploration by (simulated) human experts and AI achieves superior performance compared to AI in isolation, underscoring the framework's potential to enhance decision-making within human-AI teams.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.

Builds on

17 of 49 references.

References · 17

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  2. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
  3. 2019Memorizing Normality to Detect Anomaly: Memory-augmented Deep Autoencoder for Unsupervised Anomaly Detectioncited by 564
  4. 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
  5. 2020Multiresolution Knowledge Distillation for Anomaly Detectioncited by 285
  6. 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 271
  7. 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
  8. 2017Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defercited by 233
  9. 2020PANDA: Adapting Pretrained Features for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 175
  10. 2020Explainable Deep One-Class Classificationcited by 127
  11. 2020DROCC: Deep Robust One-Class Classificationcited by 121
  12. 2020Old is Gold: Redefining the Adversarially Learned One-Class Classifier Training Paradigmcited by 115
5 more
  1. 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 109
  2. 2019The Algorithmic Automation Problem: Prediction, Triage, and Human Effortcited by 101
  3. 2016Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancercited by 93
  4. 2021Towards Unbiased and Accurate Deferral to Multiple Expertscited by 72
  5. 2019Regression Under Human Assistancecited by 40

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 6.

12 papers.