FAIR-TAT: Improving Model Fairness Using Targeted Adversarial Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neural networks are susceptible to adversarial attacks and common corruptions, which undermine their robustness. In order to enhance model resilience against such challenges, Adversarial Training (AT) has emerged as a prominent solution. Nevertheless, adversarial robustness is often attained at the expense of model fairness during AT, i.e., disparity in class-wise robustness of the model. While distinctive classes become more robust towards such adversaries, hard to detect classes suffer. Recently, research has focused on improving model fairness specifically for perturbed images, overlooking the accuracy of the most likely non-perturbed data. Additionally, despite their robustness against the adversaries encountered during model training, state-of-the-art adversarial trained models have difficulty maintaining robustness and fairness when confronted with diverse adversarial threats or common corruptions. In this work, we address the above concerns by introducing a novel approach called Fair Targeted Adversarial Training (FAIR-TAT). We show that using targeted adversarial attacks for adversarial training (instead of untargeted attacks) can allow for more favorable trade-offs with respect to adversarial fairness. Empirical results validate the efficacy of our approach.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2024.
Builds on
45 of 56 references.
References · 45
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
33 more
- 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
- 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 350
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 242
- 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
- 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
- 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
- 2019Understanding Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning Based Medical Image Analysis Systemscited by 151
- 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
- 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 131
- 2021On the Convergence and Robustness of Adversarial Trainingcited by 127
- 20223D Common Corruptions and Data Augmentationcited by 120
- 2020Boosting Adversarial Training with Hypersphere Embeddingcited by 97
- 2022A Light Recipe to Train Robust Vision Transformerscited by 64
- 2023CFA: Class-wise Calibrated Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 53
- 2021Mind the box: l1-APGD for sparse adversarial attacks on image classifierscited by 50
- 2020Robustness May Be at Odds with Fairness: An Empirical Study on Class-wise Accuracycited by 45
- 2021Analysis and Applications of Class-wise Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
- 2023WAT: Improve the Worst-class Robustness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 27
- 2022Robust Models are less Over-Confidentcited by 25
- 2022Improving Robust Fairness via Balance Adversarial Trainingcited by 17
- 2023Neural Architecture Design and Robustness: A Datasetcited by 15
- 2023Generalist: Decoupling Natural and Robust Generalizationcited by 14
- 2022Improving Adversarial Robustness by Putting More Regularizations on Less Robust Samplescited by 11
- 2023On the unreasonable vulnerability of transformers for image restoration -- and an easy fixcited by 11
- 2024DAFA: Distance-Aware Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 11
- 2023As large as it gets: Learning infinitely large Filters via Neural Implicit Functions in the Fourier Domaincited by 8
- 2023Improving Feature Stability during Upsampling -- Spectral Artifacts and the Importance of Spatial Contextcited by 8
- 2023Improving Adversarial Robust Fairness via Anti-Bias Soft Label Distillationcited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Are Synthetic Corruptions A Reliable Proxy For Real-World Corruptions?cited by 5
- 2024Towards Class-wise Robustness Analysiscited by 3
- 2025DispBench: Benchmarking Disparity Estimation to Synthetic Corruptionscited by 0
- 2025TRIX- Trading Adversarial Fairness via Mixed Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2026RL-FAT: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Adversarial Trainingcited by 0
- 2026RL-FAT: Reinforcement Learning for Fair Adversarial Training29 Aug 2026
- 2025TRIX- Trading Adversarial Fairness via Mixed Adversarial Training10 Jul 2025
- 2025DispBench: Benchmarking Disparity Estimation to Synthetic Corruptions8 May 2025
- 2025Are Synthetic Corruptions A Reliable Proxy For Real-World Corruptions?7 May 2025
- 2024Towards Class-wise Robustness Analysis29 Nov 2024