Catastrophic overfitting can be induced with discriminative non-robust features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial training (AT) is the de facto method for building robust neural networks, but it can be computationally expensive. To mitigate this, fast single-step attacks can be used, but this may lead to catastrophic overfitting (CO). This phenomenon appears when networks gain non-trivial robustness during the first stages of AT, but then reach a breaking point where they become vulnerable in just a few iterations. The mechanisms that lead to this failure mode are still poorly understood. In this work, we study the onset of CO in single-step AT methods through controlled modifications of typical datasets of natural images. In particular, we show that CO can be induced at much smaller ε values than it was observed before just by injecting images with seemingly innocuous features. These features aid non-robust classification but are not enough to achieve robustness on their own. Through extensive experiments we analyze this novel phenomenon and discover that the presence of these easy features induces a learning shortcut that leads to CO. Our findings provide new insights into the mechanisms of CO and improve our understanding of the dynamics of AT. The code to reproduce our experiments can be found at https://github.com/gortizji/cofeatures.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2022.
Builds on
33 of 44 references.
References · 33
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 727
21 more
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 506
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 351
- 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 255
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 214
- 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 175
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 76
- 2021On the effectiveness of adversarial training against common corruptionscited by 71
- 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 43
- 2020How benign is benign overfitting?cited by 40
- 2020Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 33
- 2020Hold me tight! Influence of discriminative features on deep network boundariescited by 31
- 2020Optimism in the Face of Adversity: Understanding and Improving Deep Learning through Adversarial Robustnesscited by 28
- 2022FrequencyLowCut Pooling -- Plug & Play against Catastrophic Overfittingcited by 28
- 2018With Friends Like These, Who Needs Adversaries?cited by 19
- 2020Neural Anisotropy Directionscited by 17
- 2021ZeroGrad : Mitigating and Explaining Catastrophic Overfitting in FGSM Adversarial Trainingcited by 15
- 2020Politics of Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 12
- 2021Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 12
- 2021Adversarial for Good? How the Adversarial ML Community's Values Impede Socially Beneficial Uses of Attackscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.