Adversarial Augmentation Training Makes Action Recognition Models More Robust to Realistic Video Distribution Shifts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite recent advances in video action recognition achieving strong performance on existing benchmarks, these models often lack robustness when faced with natural distribution shifts between training and test data. We propose two novel evaluation methods to assess model resilience to such distribution disparity. One method uses two different datasets collected from different sources and uses one for training and validation, and the other for testing. More precisely, we created dataset splits of HMDB-51 or UCF-101 for training, and Kinetics-400 for testing, using the subset of the classes that are overlapping in both train and test datasets. The other proposed method extracts the feature mean of each class from the target evaluation dataset's training data (i.e. class prototype) and estimates test video prediction as a cosine similarity score between each sample to the class prototypes of each target class. This procedure does not alter model weights using the target dataset and it does not require aligning overlapping classes of two different datasets, thus is a very efficient method to test the model robustness to distribution shifts without prior knowledge of the target distribution. We address the robustness problem by adversarial augmentation training - generating augmented views of videos that are "hard" for the classification model by applying gradient ascent on the augmentation parameters - as well as "curriculum" scheduling the strength of the video augmentations. We experimentally demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed adversarial augmentation approach over baselines across three state-of-the-art action recognition models - TSM, Video Swin Transformer, and Uniformer. The presented work provides critical insight into model robustness to distribution shifts and presents effective techniques to enhance video action recognition performance in a real-world deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2024.
Builds on
56 of 66 references.
References · 56
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,015
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
- 2016Categorical Reparameterization with Gumbel-Softmaxcited by 2,739
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,293
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,917
- 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
- 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
38 more
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,329
- 2017CyCADA: Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 1,082
- 2014Two-Stream Convolutional Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 1,068
- 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
- 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 856
- 2017Temporal Relational Reasoning in Videoscited by 324
- 2016Unsupervised Pixel-Level Domain Adaptation with Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 308
- 2016Learning from Simulated and Unsupervised Images through Adversarial Trainingcited by 288
- 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 288
- 2017Temporal Segment Networks for Action Recognition in Videoscited by 279
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 279
- 2018Generalizing Across Domains via Cross-Gradient Trainingcited by 268
- 2019Fast AutoAugmentcited by 243
- 2020Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning Strongercited by 243
- 2020Deep Domain-Adversarial Image Generation for Domain Generalisationcited by 231
- 2015Simultaneous Deep Transfer Across Domains and Taskscited by 206
- 2018Multi-Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 196
- 2022UniFormer: Unified Transformer for Efficient Spatiotemporal Representation Learningcited by 184
- 2020TDN: Temporal Difference Networks for Efficient Action Recognitioncited by 183
- 2016Deep Reconstruction-Classification Networks for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 163
- 2019Population Based Augmentation: Efficient Learning of Augmentation Policy Schedulescited by 154
- 2018AdaFrame: Adaptive Frame Selection for Fast Video Recognitioncited by 134
- 2019SCSampler: Sampling Salient Clips from Video for Efficient Action Recognitioncited by 134
- 2016Unsupervised Cross-Domain Image Generationcited by 125
- 2017Unsupervised Learning of Sentence Embeddings using Compositional n-Gram Featurescited by 104
- 2019Faster AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Strategies using Backpropagationcited by 96
- 2018Curriculum Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
- 2014Domain-Adversarial Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2020SMART Frame Selection for Action Recognitioncited by 73
- 2020On Isometry Robustness of Deep 3D Point Cloud Models under Adversarial Attackscited by 46
- 2022Deep Frequency Filtering for Domain Generalizationcited by 43
- 2020MVFNet: Multi-View Fusion Network for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 36
- 2022Video Test-Time Adaptation for Action Recognitioncited by 35
- 2021Benchmarking the Robustness of Spatial-Temporal Models Against Corruptionscited by 34
- 2022Large-scale Robustness Analysis of Video Action Recognition Modelscited by 29
- 2020Learn2Perturb: an End-to-end Feature Perturbation Learning to Improve Adversarial Robustnesscited by 27
- 2022The Enemy of My Enemy is My Friend: Exploring Inverse Adversaries for Improving Adversarial Trainingcited by 23
- 2015Deep Transfer Network: Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 20
50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.