mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ReliCD: A Reliable Cognitive Diagnosis Framework with Confidence Awareness

arXiv 2401.10749 ↗First posted 29 Dec 2023cs.CY cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

During the past few decades, cognitive diagnostics modeling has attracted increasing attention in computational education communities, which is capable of quantifying the learning status and knowledge mastery levels of students. Indeed, the recent advances in neural networks have greatly enhanced the performance of traditional cognitive diagnosis models through learning the deep representations of students and exercises. Nevertheless, existing approaches often suffer from the issue of overconfidence in predicting students' mastery levels, which is primarily caused by the unavoidable noise and sparsity in realistic student-exercise interaction data, severely hindering the educational application of diagnostic feedback. To address this, in this paper, we propose a novel Reliable Cognitive Diagnosis(ReliCD) framework, which can quantify the confidence of the diagnosis feedback and is flexible for different cognitive diagnostic functions. Specifically, we first propose a Bayesian method to explicitly estimate the state uncertainty of different knowledge concepts for students, which enables the confidence quantification of diagnostic feedback. In particular, to account for potential differences, we suggest modeling individual prior distributions for the latent variables of different ability concepts using a pre-trained model. Additionally, we introduce a logical hypothesis for ranking confidence levels. Along this line, we design a novel calibration loss to optimize the confidence parameters by modeling the process of student performance prediction. Finally, extensive experiments on four real-world datasets clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of our ReliCD framework.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Dec 2023.

Builds on

16 of 39 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
  4. 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
  5. 2018Understanding disentangling in β-VAEcited by 332
  6. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  7. 2020Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 113
  8. 2019Neural Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education Systemscited by 75
  9. 2019Enhancing Item Response Theory for Cognitive Diagnosiscited by 25
  10. 2018Conditional Variational Autoencoder for Neural Machine Translationcited by 20
  11. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Talent Analyticscited by 17
  12. 2019MAE: Mutual Posterior-Divergence Regularization for Variational AutoEncoderscited by 15
4 more
  1. 2018Failure Prediction for Autonomous Drivingcited by 14
  2. 2022Failure Detection in Medical Image Classification: A Reality Check and Benchmarking Testbedcited by 12
  3. 2021Contextualized Knowledge-aware Attentive Neural Network: Enhancing Answer Selection with Knowledgecited by 7
  4. 2021Regularizing Variational Autoencoder with Diversity and Uncertainty Awarenesscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.