mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selecting Subsets of Source Data for Transfer Learning with Applications in Metal Additive Manufacturing

arXiv 2401.08715 ↗First posted 16 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Considering data insufficiency in metal additive manufacturing (AM), transfer learning (TL) has been adopted to extract knowledge from source domains (e.g., completed printings) to improve the modeling performance in target domains (e.g., new printings). Current applications use all accessible source data directly in TL with no regard to the similarity between source and target data. This paper proposes a systematic method to find appropriate subsets of source data based on similarities between the source and target datasets for a given set of limited target domain data. Such similarity is characterized by the spatial and model distance metrics. A Pareto frontier-based source data selection method is developed, where the source data located on the Pareto frontier defined by two similarity distance metrics are selected iteratively. The method is integrated into an instance-based TL method (decision tree regression model) and a model-based TL method (fine-tuned artificial neural network). Both models are then tested on several regression tasks in metal AM. Comparison results demonstrate that 1) the source data selection method is general and supports integration with various TL methods and distance metrics, 2) compared with using all source data, the proposed method can find a small subset of source data from the same domain with better TL performance in metal AM regression tasks involving different processes and machines, and 3) when multiple source domains exist, the source data selection method could find the subset from one source domain to obtain comparable or better TL performance than the model constructed using data from all source domains.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jan 2024.

Builds on

16 of 76 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,200
  2. 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
  3. 2017Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representationscited by 207
  4. 2020Unsupervised Domain Clusters in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 160
  5. 2021Hyperparameter Optimization: Foundations, Algorithms, Best Practices and Open Challengescited by 145
  6. 2019Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learningcited by 144
  7. 2017Learning to select data for transfer learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 64
  8. 2019AutoSeM: Automatic Task Selection and Mixing in Multi-Task Learningcited by 22
  9. 2020Cost-effective Selection of Pretraining Data: A Case Study of Pretraining BERT on Social Mediacited by 16
  10. 2019Using Similarity Measures to Select Pretraining Data for NERcited by 15
  11. 2021To Share or not to Share: Predicting Sets of Sources for Model Transfer Learningcited by 11
  12. 2020Selective Weak Supervision for Neural Information Retrievalcited by 10
4 more
  1. 2020An Overview of Distance and Similarity Functions for Structured Datacited by 10
  2. 2021A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Model for Porosity Analysis in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturingcited by 5
  3. 2023Comparison of Transfer Learning based Additive Manufacturing Models via A Case Studycited by 1
  4. 2023System identification and closed-loop control of laser hot-wire directed energy deposition using the parameter-signature-property modeling schemecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.