mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Redundancy Analysis and Mitigation for Machine Learning-Based Process Monitoring of Additive Manufacturing

arXiv 2504.21317 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2025cs.CE cs.LG eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The deployment of machine learning (ML)-based process monitoring systems has significantly advanced additive manufacturing (AM) by enabling real-time defect detection, quality assessment, and process optimization. However, redundancy is a critical yet often overlooked challenge in the deployment and operation of ML-based AM process monitoring systems. Excessive redundancy leads to increased equipment costs, compromised model performance, and high computational requirements, posing barriers to industrial adoption. However, existing research lacks a unified definition of redundancy and a systematic framework for its evaluation and mitigation. This paper defines redundancy in ML-based AM process monitoring and categorizes it into sample-level, feature-level, and model-level redundancy. A comprehensive multi-level redundancy mitigation (MLRM) framework is proposed, incorporating advanced methods such as data registration, downscaling, cross-modality knowledge transfer, and model pruning to systematically reduce redundancy while improving model performance. The framework is validated through an ML-based in-situ defect detection case study for directed energy deposition (DED), demonstrating a 91% reduction in latency, a 47% decrease in error rate, and a 99.4% reduction in storage requirements. Additionally, the proposed approach lowers sensor costs and energy consumption, enabling a lightweight, cost-effective, and scalable monitoring system. By defining redundancy and introducing a structured mitigation framework, this study establishes redundancy analysis and mitigation as a key enabler of efficient ML-based process monitoring in production environments.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.

Builds on

9 of 48 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  2. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  3. 2021A Farewell to the Bias-Variance Tradeoff? An Overview of the Theory of Overparameterized Machine Learningcited by 57
  4. 2018Information Theory: A Tutorial Introductioncited by 7
  5. 2024In-situ process monitoring and adaptive quality enhancement in laser additive manufacturing: a critical reviewcited by 5
  6. 2023Knowledge Distillation-based Information Sharing for Online Process Monitoring in Decentralized Manufacturing Systemcited by 4
  7. 2024Selecting Subsets of Source Data for Transfer Learning with Applications in Metal Additive Manufacturingcited by 3
  8. 2023In-situ monitoring additive manufacturing process with AI edge computingcited by 2
  9. 2024Audio-visual cross-modality knowledge transfer for machine learning-based in-situ monitoring in laser additive manufacturingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.