mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Model for Porosity Analysis in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing

arXiv 2101.05605 ↗First posted 13 Jan 2021cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To control part quality, it is critical to analyze pore generation mechanisms, laying theoretical foundation for future porosity control. Current porosity analysis models use machine setting parameters, such as laser angle and part pose. However, these setting-based models are machine dependent, hence they often do not transfer to analysis of porosity for a different machine. To address the first problem, a physics-informed, data-driven model (PIM), which instead of directly using machine setting parameters to predict porosity levels of printed parts, it first interprets machine settings into physical effects, such as laser energy density and laser radiation pressure. Then, these physical, machine independent effects are used to predict porosity levels according to pass, flag, fail categories instead of focusing on quantitative pore size prediction. With six learning methods evaluation, PIM proved to achieve good performances with prediction error of 10~26%. Finally, pore-encouraging influence and pore-suppressing influence were analyzed for quality analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jan 2021.

Builds on

3 of 61 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing: Predicting temperature and melt pool fluid dynamics using physics-informed neural networkscited by 42
  2. 2017Machine learning modeling of superconducting critical temperaturecited by 32
  3. 2020Physics-informed machine learning for composition-process-property alloy design: shape memory alloy demonstrationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

5 papers.