mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learned Best-Effort LLM Serving

arXiv 2401.07886 ↗First posted 15 Jan 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many applications must provide low-latency LLM service to users or risk unacceptable user experience. However, over-provisioning resources to serve fluctuating request patterns is often prohibitively expensive. In this work, we present a best-effort serving system that employs deep reinforcement learning to adjust service quality based on the task distribution and system load. Our best-effort system can maintain availability with over 10x higher client request rates, serves above 96% of peak performance 4.1x more often, and serves above 98% of peak performance 2.3x more often than static serving on unpredictable workloads. Our learned router is robust to shifts in both the arrival and task distribution. Compared to static serving, learned best-effort serving allows for cost-efficient serving through increased hardware utility. Additionally, we argue that learned best-effort LLM serving is applicable in wide variety of settings and provides application developers great flexibility to meet their specific needs.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jan 2024.

Builds on

18 of 29 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,767
  3. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  4. 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,464
  5. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
  6. 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,818
  7. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,503
  8. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  9. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  10. 2015Deep Reinforcement Learning with Double Q-learningcited by 1,704
  11. 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
  12. 2022Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decodingcited by 1,615
6 more
  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  2. 2017Ray: A Distributed Framework for Emerging AI Applicationscited by 516
  3. 2023Accelerating LLM Inference with Staged Speculative Decodingcited by 151
  4. 2020Serving DNNs like Clockwork: Performance Predictability from the Bottom Upcited by 119
  5. 2020Serverless in the Wild: Characterizing and Optimizing the Serverless Workload at a Large Cloud Providercited by 65
  6. 2023DNNShifter: An Efficient DNN Pruning System for Edge Computingcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025xRouter: Training Cost-Aware LLMs Orchestration System via Reinforcement Learning
  2. 2026Position: LLM Serving Needs Mathematical Optimization and Algorithmic Foundations, Not Just Heuristics
  3. 2026CALVO: Improve Serving Efficiency for LLM Inferences with Intense Network Demands
  4. 2026From Production Traffic to Post-Training: Building a Self-Hosted LLM That Covers the Corporate Request Mix
  5. 2025Niyama : Breaking the Silos of LLM Inference Serving
  6. 2026TailSieve: Partial-Rollout-Guided Tail Routing for LLM Rollouts
  7. 2026RouterWise: Joint Resource Allocation and Routing for Latency-Aware Multi-Model LLM Serving
  8. 2026VibeServe: Can AI Agents Build Bespoke LLM Serving Systems?