Functional Graphical Models: Structure Enables Offline Data-Driven Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While machine learning models are typically trained to solve prediction problems, we might often want to use them for optimization problems. For example, given a dataset of proteins and their corresponding fluorescence levels, we might want to optimize for a new protein with the highest possible fluorescence. This kind of data-driven optimization (DDO) presents a range of challenges beyond those in standard prediction problems, since we need models that successfully predict the performance of new designs that are better than the best designs seen in the training set. It is not clear theoretically when existing approaches can even perform better than the naive approach that simply selects the best design in the dataset. In this paper, we study how structure can enable sample-efficient data-driven optimization. To formalize the notion of structure, we introduce functional graphical models (FGMs) and show theoretically how they can provide for principled data-driven optimization by decomposing the original high-dimensional optimization problem into smaller sub-problems. This allows us to derive much more practical regret bounds for DDO, and the result implies that DDO with FGMs can achieve nearly optimal designs in situations where naive approaches fail due to insufficient coverage of the offline data. We further present a data-driven optimization algorithm that inferes the FGM structure itself, either over the original input variables or a latent variable representation of the inputs.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2024.
Builds on
24 of 53 references.
References · 24
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,920
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,809
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,293
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 899
- 2019Advantage-Weighted Regression: Simple and Scalable Off-Policy Reinforcement Learningcited by 782
- 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 765
- 2019Behavior Regularized Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 662
- 2019Information-Theoretic Considerations in Batch Reinforcement Learningcited by 287
- 2021Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of Pessimismcited by 279
- 2021Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 269
12 more
- 2019Diagnosing and Enhancing VAE Modelscited by 193
- 2015High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation and Bandits via Additive Modelscited by 139
- 2019Conditioning by adaptive sampling for robust designcited by 111
- 2022Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 97
- 2021Conservative Objective Models for Effective Offline Model-Based Optimizationcited by 88
- 2019Model Inversion Networks for Model-Based Optimizationcited by 83
- 2018High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Additive Models with Overlapping Groupscited by 59
- 2023Are Random Decompositions all we need in High Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation?cited by 36
- 2020ConfuciuX: Autonomous Hardware Resource Assignment for DNN Accelerators using Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
- 2022Data-Driven Offline Decision-Making via Invariant Representation Learningcited by 31
- 2021Data-Driven Offline Optimization For Architecting Hardware Acceleratorscited by 29
- 2017Decentralized High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimization with Factor Graphscited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025Offline Model-Based Optimization: Comprehensive Reviewcited by 15
- 2024Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rankcited by 13
- 2024Monotone, Bi-Lipschitz, and Polyak-Lojasiewicz Networkscited by 9
- 2025Towards Universal Offline Black-Box Optimization via Learning Language Model Embeddingscited by 7
- 2024Cliqueformer: Model-Based Optimization with Structured Transformerscited by 3
- 2026On the Learnability of Offline Model-Based Optimization: A Ranking Perspectivecited by 2
- 2025Learning Design-Score Manifold to Guide Diffusion Models for Offline Optimizationcited by 1
- 2025Conservative quantum offline model-based optimizationcited by 0
- 2025Leveraging Discrete Function Decomposability for Scientific Designcited by 0
- 2026Offline Materials Optimization with CliqueFlowmercited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Learnability in Offline Data-driven Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Rethinking Learnability in Offline Data-driven Optimization1 Sep 2026
- 2026Offline Materials Optimization with CliqueFlowmer6 Mar 2026
- 2026On the Learnability of Offline Model-Based Optimization: A Ranking Perspective4 Mar 2026
- 2025Leveraging Discrete Function Decomposability for Scientific Design4 Nov 2025
- 2025Conservative quantum offline model-based optimization24 Jun 2025
- 2025Towards Universal Offline Black-Box Optimization via Learning Language Model Embeddings8 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning Design-Score Manifold to Guide Diffusion Models for Offline Optimization6 Jun 2025
- 2025Offline Model-Based Optimization: Comprehensive Review21 Mar 2025
- 2024Cliqueformer: Model-Based Optimization with Structured Transformers17 Oct 2024
- 2024Offline Model-Based Optimization by Learning to Rank15 Oct 2024
- 2024Monotone, Bi-Lipschitz, and Polyak-Lojasiewicz Networks2 Feb 2024